Buying Guide
The Best Thermal Paste Syringes
Five thermal pastes ranked on tube size and amount, where the NT-H2 10g has the largest tube size; the MX-6 8g is the cheapest route in.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated

A syringe lets you place a controlled dot of paste and reseal it for the next build. Every pick comes in one, ordered by the amount in the tube.
We ranked these thermal pastes on amount, electrically non-conductive and in the box using manufacturer specifications; where a maker leaves out electrically non-conductive, we say so rather than guess, since we have not benched them.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

Largest Tube Size
Noctua NT-H2 (10g)The largest tube size here (10g).
Best for: Buyers who put tube size first.
Check price for Noctua NT-H2 (10g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Lowest Price Here
ARCTIC MX-6 (8g)The cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core.
Best for: Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 (8g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
ARCTIC MX-7 (8g)A dense, high-filler formula.
Best for: Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-7 (8g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g)A metal-free formula.
Best for: Buyers who want metal-free formula.
Check price for ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Worth a Look
ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Best for: Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Our Picks
Largest Tube Size1 of 5
Noctua NT-H2 (10g)
The 10g NT-H2 is Noctua's second-generation paste in a size meant for builders who work on many machines, with 10 cleaning wipes included.
Best for
- Buyers who put tube size first.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the MX-6 8g cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
Noctua quotes around 9 to 60 applications depending on CPU size. Nothing else here matches its 10g tube size; the MX-6 8g comes closest at 8g. You also get enough for dozens of mainstream CPUs.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. Another plus: maker-rated for up to 5 years without reapplying. At our last price check it topped the group, with the MX-7 8g the nearest cheaper option.
Key specs
- Amount
- 10g
- Rated service life
- up to 5 years
- Applications per tube
- About 9 to 60
- In the box
- 10 cleaning wipes
- Application
- No need to spread before mounting
Pros
- 10g is enough for several applications
- Maker-rated for up to 5 years without reapplying
- Includes 10 cleaning wipes
- The second generation of Noctua's NT-H1
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing
Lowest Price Here2 of 5
ARCTIC MX-6 (8g)
MX-6 improves on MX-4's thermal resistance by ARCTIC's own measure and is thin enough for direct-die GPU and console chips.
Best for
- Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.
Skip if
- Worth skipping when tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g) is a problem.
Why we like it
The 8g tube is the value size for anyone who repastes more than one machine. Its viscosity also suits direct-die work on graphics cards and consoles, where a thin layer matters. It is neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, so a little overflow onto nearby parts does no harm.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. It was the cheapest of the group when we checked; the Frost X55 Core was the next step up. The main gap: tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g). If that matters, the NT-H2 10g comes in at 10g.
Key specs
- Amount
- 8g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
Pros
- 8g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure
- Viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips
Cons
- Tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g)
Also Consider3 of 5
ARCTIC MX-7 (8g)
MX-7 is ARCTIC's densest paste, built to resist pump-out, drying and bleeding across repeated heat cycles.
Best for
- Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the MX-6 8g cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
It is designed to be pressed out by the cooler rather than spread, and the 8g tube lasts for many builds. On tube size it ties with the MX-6 8g at 8g. It also offers a dense, high-filler formula.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. It was priced above the MX-6 with cleaner and below the NT-H2 10g at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Amount
- 8g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- Application
- Cannot be spread by hand; cooler pressure distributes it
Pros
- 8g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Dense, high-filler formula
- Resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding over repeated heat cycles
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing
Strong Alternative4 of 5
ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g)
Frost X55 Core is ID-COOLING's higher-rated paste at 16.2 W/mK, with the same metal-free, non-conductive formula approach as the X45.
Best for
- Buyers who want metal-free formula.
Skip if
- Price-first buyers should look at the MX-6 8g, which cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
It is a low-cost way to get the highest conductivity figure in this group. It is metal-free and non-conductive, so a spill onto the board does not short anything. On tube size it ties with the MX-6 with cleaner at 4g.
It also comes with resistance to drying, cracking and separation. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. When we checked, only the MX-6 8g cost less, and the MX-6 with cleaner cost more.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Conductivity
- 16.2 W/mK (maker's figure)
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Maker-rated 16.2 W/mK conductivity
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Metal-free formula
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing
Worth a Look5 of 5
ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)
The 4g MX-6 comes with six MX Cleaner wipes, so the old paste comes off without a trip for isopropyl alcohol.
Best for
- Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Skip if
- Skip it if tube size matters most to you; the NT-H2 10g offers 10g.
Why we like it
It is neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, which makes it safe for bare GPU dies. It matches the Frost X55 Core on tube size (4g). You also get lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Its price falls between the Frost X55 Core and the MX-7 8g, based on our last check. If tube size is your priority, the NT-H2 10g (10g) is the stronger choice.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- In the box
- six MX Cleaner wipes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Includes six MX Cleaner wipes
- Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure
Cons
- Tube size trails the NT-H2 10g (10g)
- Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing
How We Chose These Thermal Paste Syringes
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

- How these picks were ranked
- We compared five pastes on tube size, electrically non-conductive, in the box and application as the makers state them. These are research figures, not bench results: 1 of 5 picks leave out electrically non-conductive.
- What every pick has in common
- All 5, from the NT-H2 10g to the MX-6 with cleaner, state tube size.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The NT-H2 10g gives no electrically non-conductive; the MX-6 8g, the MX-7 8g and the Frost X55 Core give no in the box.
- Price range
- From the MX-6 8g to the NT-H2 10g, all sat in the under $50 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in a Thermal Paste Syringe
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
Tube size across these picks
Across these 5 picks tube size spans 4g (the MX-6 with cleaner) to 10g (the NT-H2 10g). The MX-6 8g comes second at 8g, in the same price tier as the NT-H2 10g.
In the box
The NT-H2 10g lists 10 cleaning wipes; the MX-6 with cleaner lists six MX Cleaner wipes.

An all-in-one liquid cooler pump block above a graphics card Extras that separate them
The MX-6 8g: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips. The MX-7 8g: resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding over repeated heat cycles. The Frost X55 Core: resistance to drying, cracking and separation.
How much to spend
All 5 sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, from the MX-6 8g at the low end to the NT-H2 10g at the top, so decide on features first.

A case with purple-lit front fans and the motherboard area behind them Start from what matters most
Buyers who put tube size first: the NT-H2 10g. Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up: the MX-6 8g.
How to Choose a Thermal Paste Syringe
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Buyers who put tube size first | NT-H2 10g | The largest tube size here (10g) |
| Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up | MX-6 8g | The cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core |
| Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula | MX-7 8g | A dense, high-filler formula |
| Buyers who want metal-free formula | Frost X55 Core | A metal-free formula |
| Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure | MX-6 with cleaner | Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure |
Scroll sideways to see every column.

Key specs side by side
The NT-H2 10g leads on tube size at 10g, ahead of the MX-6 8g at 8g. "Not listed" marks electrically non-conductive where the NT-H2 10g leaves the figure out.
| Paste | Amount | Electrically non-conductive | In the box | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT-H2 10g | 10g | Not listed | 10 cleaning wipes | No need to spread before mounting |
| MX-6 8g | 8g | Yes | Not listed | Not listed |
| MX-7 8g | 8g | Yes | Not listed | Cannot be spread by hand; cooler pressure distributes it |
| Frost X55 Core | 4g | Yes | Not listed | Not listed |
| MX-6 with cleaner | 4g | Yes | six MX Cleaner wipes | Not listed |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the MX-6 8g compare with the NT-H2 10g on tube size?
Between the top two, it is 10g on the NT-H2 10g against 8g on the MX-6 8g, a 25% difference. The MX-6 with cleaner is at the other end of this group with 4g.
What does the NT-H2 10g add over the MX-6 8g?
On paper it adds tube size (10g against 8g). Both sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, so the gains in tube size cost little extra by tier.
Why is the MX-6 8g our Lowest Price Here pick?
The label rests on the cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core. It is aimed at spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.
Does the MX-6 8g have electrically non-conductive, and which others do?
The MX-6 8g, the MX-7 8g, the Frost X55 Core and the MX-6 with cleaner have it. The NT-H2 10g has no electrically non-conductive listed, so 4 of 5 picks are covered here.
What extras do the NT-H2 10g and the MX-6 8g include?
The NT-H2 10g: the second generation of Noctua's NT-H1. The MX-6 8g: lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure. The MX-7 8g: a dense, high-filler formula.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the NT-H2 10g, chosen for the largest tube size here (10g). Look at the MX-6 8g for the cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core, the MX-7 8g for a dense, high-filler formula and the Frost X55 Core for a metal-free formula if those matter more to you.
A pea-sized dot in the centre is enough for most CPUs.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best Thermal Pastes for CPUs and GPUs
- Related guideThe Best CPU Air Coolers
- Related guideThe Best Air Coolers
- Lower budgetThe Best Thermal Paste Under $10
- Similar guideThe Best Thermal Paste Kits
- ExplainerPC Airflow Explained
- ExplainerHow Many Case Fans Do You Need?
- Check compatibility: processorsCPU Name Suffixes Explained: K, KF, F, X, X3D and G
- Similar guideThe Best ARCTIC Thermal Paste
- Topic hubAll cpu coolers and cooling guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles