Buying Guide

The Best Thermal Paste Syringes

Five thermal pastes ranked on tube size and amount, where the NT-H2 10g has the largest tube size; the MX-6 8g is the cheapest route in.

By , PC Hardware Editor

12 min read5 products evaluated

PC components laid out on a workbench ready for a build
Illustrative image

A syringe lets you place a controlled dot of paste and reseal it for the next build. Every pick comes in one, ordered by the amount in the tube.

We ranked these thermal pastes on amount, electrically non-conductive and in the box using manufacturer specifications; where a maker leaves out electrically non-conductive, we say so rather than guess, since we have not benched them.

Quick Picks

Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

  1. Largest Tube Size

    Noctua NT-H2 (10g)

    The largest tube size here (10g).

    Best for: Buyers who put tube size first.

    Check price for Noctua NT-H2 (10g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  2. Lowest Price Here

    ARCTIC MX-6 (8g)

    The cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core.

    Best for: Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.

    Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 (8g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  3. Also Consider

    ARCTIC MX-7 (8g)

    A dense, high-filler formula.

    Best for: Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.

    Check price for ARCTIC MX-7 (8g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  4. Strong Alternative

    ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g)

    A metal-free formula.

    Best for: Buyers who want metal-free formula.

    Check price for ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  5. Worth a Look

    ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)

    Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.

    Best for: Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.

    Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

Our Picks

Largest Tube Size1 of 5

Noctua NT-H2 (10g)

The 10g NT-H2 is Noctua's second-generation paste in a size meant for builders who work on many machines, with 10 cleaning wipes included.

Best for

Buyers who put tube size first.

Skip if

Skip it if price comes first: the MX-6 8g cost less when we checked.
Noctua NT-H2 (10g)

Why we like it

Noctua quotes around 9 to 60 applications depending on CPU size. Nothing else here matches its 10g tube size; the MX-6 8g comes closest at 8g. You also get enough for dozens of mainstream CPUs.

Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. Another plus: maker-rated for up to 5 years without reapplying. At our last price check it topped the group, with the MX-7 8g the nearest cheaper option.

Key specs

Amount
10g
Rated service life
up to 5 years
Applications per tube
About 9 to 60
In the box
10 cleaning wipes
Application
No need to spread before mounting

Pros

  • 10g is enough for several applications
  • Maker-rated for up to 5 years without reapplying
  • Includes 10 cleaning wipes
  • The second generation of Noctua's NT-H1

Cons

  • Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing

Lowest Price Here2 of 5

ARCTIC MX-6 (8g)

MX-6 improves on MX-4's thermal resistance by ARCTIC's own measure and is thin enough for direct-die GPU and console chips.

Best for

Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.

Skip if

Worth skipping when tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g) is a problem.
ARCTIC MX-6 (8g)

Why we like it

The 8g tube is the value size for anyone who repastes more than one machine. Its viscosity also suits direct-die work on graphics cards and consoles, where a thin layer matters. It is neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, so a little overflow onto nearby parts does no harm.

Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. It was the cheapest of the group when we checked; the Frost X55 Core was the next step up. The main gap: tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g). If that matters, the NT-H2 10g comes in at 10g.

Key specs

Amount
8g
Electrically non-conductive
Yes

Pros

  • 8g is enough for several applications
  • Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
  • Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure
  • Viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips

Cons

  • Tube size of 8g, behind the NT-H2 10g (10g)

Also Consider3 of 5

ARCTIC MX-7 (8g)

MX-7 is ARCTIC's densest paste, built to resist pump-out, drying and bleeding across repeated heat cycles.

Best for

Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.

Skip if

Skip it if price comes first: the MX-6 8g cost less when we checked.
ARCTIC MX-7 (8g)

Why we like it

It is designed to be pressed out by the cooler rather than spread, and the 8g tube lasts for many builds. On tube size it ties with the MX-6 8g at 8g. It also offers a dense, high-filler formula.

Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. It was priced above the MX-6 with cleaner and below the NT-H2 10g at the time of writing.

Key specs

Amount
8g
Electrically non-conductive
Yes
Application
Cannot be spread by hand; cooler pressure distributes it

Pros

  • 8g is enough for several applications
  • Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
  • Dense, high-filler formula
  • Resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding over repeated heat cycles

Cons

  • Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing

Strong Alternative4 of 5

ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g)

Frost X55 Core is ID-COOLING's higher-rated paste at 16.2 W/mK, with the same metal-free, non-conductive formula approach as the X45.

Best for

Buyers who want metal-free formula.

Skip if

Price-first buyers should look at the MX-6 8g, which cost less when we checked.
ID-COOLING Frost X55 Core (4g)

Why we like it

It is a low-cost way to get the highest conductivity figure in this group. It is metal-free and non-conductive, so a spill onto the board does not short anything. On tube size it ties with the MX-6 with cleaner at 4g.

It also comes with resistance to drying, cracking and separation. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. When we checked, only the MX-6 8g cost less, and the MX-6 with cleaner cost more.

Key specs

Amount
4g
Conductivity
16.2 W/mK (maker's figure)
Electrically non-conductive
Yes

Pros

  • 4g is enough for several applications
  • Maker-rated 16.2 W/mK conductivity
  • Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
  • Metal-free formula

Cons

  • Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing

Worth a Look5 of 5

ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)

The 4g MX-6 comes with six MX Cleaner wipes, so the old paste comes off without a trip for isopropyl alcohol.

Best for

Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.

Skip if

Skip it if tube size matters most to you; the NT-H2 10g offers 10g.
ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)

Why we like it

It is neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, which makes it safe for bare GPU dies. It matches the Frost X55 Core on tube size (4g). You also get lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips.

Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Its price falls between the Frost X55 Core and the MX-7 8g, based on our last check. If tube size is your priority, the NT-H2 10g (10g) is the stronger choice.

Key specs

Amount
4g
Electrically non-conductive
Yes
In the box
six MX Cleaner wipes

Pros

  • 4g is enough for several applications
  • Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
  • Includes six MX Cleaner wipes
  • Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure

Cons

  • Tube size trails the NT-H2 10g (10g)
  • Costs more than the MX-6 8g at the time of writing

How We Chose These Thermal Paste Syringes

Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

A tower air cooler in a case with red-lit fans
A tower air cooler in a case with red-lit fans
How these picks were ranked
We compared five pastes on tube size, electrically non-conductive, in the box and application as the makers state them. These are research figures, not bench results: 1 of 5 picks leave out electrically non-conductive.
What every pick has in common
All 5, from the NT-H2 10g to the MX-6 with cleaner, state tube size.
Where the specs have gaps
The NT-H2 10g gives no electrically non-conductive; the MX-6 8g, the MX-7 8g and the Frost X55 Core give no in the box.
Price range
From the MX-6 8g to the NT-H2 10g, all sat in the under $50 tier when we checked.

What to Look for in a Thermal Paste Syringe

Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.

  1. Tube size across these picks

    Across these 5 picks tube size spans 4g (the MX-6 with cleaner) to 10g (the NT-H2 10g). The MX-6 8g comes second at 8g, in the same price tier as the NT-H2 10g.

  2. In the box

    The NT-H2 10g lists 10 cleaning wipes; the MX-6 with cleaner lists six MX Cleaner wipes.

    An all-in-one liquid cooler pump block above a graphics card
    An all-in-one liquid cooler pump block above a graphics card
  3. Extras that separate them

    The MX-6 8g: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips. The MX-7 8g: resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding over repeated heat cycles. The Frost X55 Core: resistance to drying, cracking and separation.

  4. How much to spend

    All 5 sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, from the MX-6 8g at the low end to the NT-H2 10g at the top, so decide on features first.

    A case with purple-lit front fans and the motherboard area behind them
    A case with purple-lit front fans and the motherboard area behind them
  5. Start from what matters most

    Buyers who put tube size first: the NT-H2 10g. Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up: the MX-6 8g.

How to Choose a Thermal Paste Syringe

By priority

PriorityConsiderWhy
Buyers who put tube size firstNT-H2 10gThe largest tube size here (10g)
Spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step upMX-6 8gThe cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core
Buyers who want dense, high-filler formulaMX-7 8gA dense, high-filler formula
Buyers who want metal-free formulaFrost X55 CoreA metal-free formula
Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measureMX-6 with cleanerLower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure

Scroll sideways to see every column.

A tower air cooler with brown fans installed in a PC
A tower air cooler with brown fans installed in a PC

Key specs side by side

The NT-H2 10g leads on tube size at 10g, ahead of the MX-6 8g at 8g. "Not listed" marks electrically non-conductive where the NT-H2 10g leaves the figure out.

PasteAmountElectrically non-conductiveIn the boxApplication
NT-H2 10g10gNot listed10 cleaning wipesNo need to spread before mounting
MX-6 8g8gYesNot listedNot listed
MX-7 8g8gYesNot listedCannot be spread by hand; cooler pressure distributes it
Frost X55 Core4gYesNot listedNot listed
MX-6 with cleaner4gYessix MX Cleaner wipesNot listed

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the MX-6 8g compare with the NT-H2 10g on tube size?

Between the top two, it is 10g on the NT-H2 10g against 8g on the MX-6 8g, a 25% difference. The MX-6 with cleaner is at the other end of this group with 4g.

What does the NT-H2 10g add over the MX-6 8g?

On paper it adds tube size (10g against 8g). Both sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, so the gains in tube size cost little extra by tier.

Why is the MX-6 8g our Lowest Price Here pick?

The label rests on the cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core. It is aimed at spending as little as possible, with the Frost X55 Core the next step up.

Does the MX-6 8g have electrically non-conductive, and which others do?

The MX-6 8g, the MX-7 8g, the Frost X55 Core and the MX-6 with cleaner have it. The NT-H2 10g has no electrically non-conductive listed, so 4 of 5 picks are covered here.

What extras do the NT-H2 10g and the MX-6 8g include?

The NT-H2 10g: the second generation of Noctua's NT-H1. The MX-6 8g: lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure. The MX-7 8g: a dense, high-filler formula.

Bottom Line

Our first pick is the NT-H2 10g, chosen for the largest tube size here (10g). Look at the MX-6 8g for the cheapest way into this group, below the Frost X55 Core, the MX-7 8g for a dense, high-filler formula and the Frost X55 Core for a metal-free formula if those matter more to you.

A pea-sized dot in the centre is enough for most CPUs.

About the author

PC Hardware Editor

Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.

Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility

View all articles