Buying Guide
The Best ARCTIC Thermal Paste
From the MX-4 to the MX-6: five thermal pastes ranked on tube size and amount, with who should skip each one.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated

ARCTIC's MX-4, MX-6 and MX-7 differ mainly in consistency and how they resist pump-out. Every pick is an ARCTIC MX paste, ordered from the lowest price.
Our comparison rests on published figures for amount, compound and electrically non-conductive; nothing here was tested in-house, and where a maker leaves out compound, we say so.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

Lowest Price Here
ARCTIC MX-4 (4g)The cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula.
Best for: Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
ARCTIC MX-4 with Spatula (4g)An authenticity code on every pack.
Best for: Buyers who want authenticity code on every pack.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 with Spatula (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
ARCTIC MX-7 (4g)A dense, high-filler formula.
Best for: Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-7 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Worth a Look
ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Best for: Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Premium Pick
ARCTIC MX-6 (4g)The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Best for: Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
| Pick | Why it stands out | Best for | Check price |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | The cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula. | Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | An authenticity code on every pack. | Buyers who want authenticity code on every pack. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 with Spatula (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A dense, high-filler formula. | Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-7 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure. | Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure. | Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-6 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
Our Picks
Lowest Price Here1 of 5
ARCTIC MX-4 (4g)
MX-4 is the long-running default for good reason: a carbon-based, non-conductive paste that ARCTIC says lasts at least eight years once applied.
Best for
- Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula.
Skip if
- Look at the other picks if you need a feature not covered above.
Why we like it
It forgives a clumsy first application, and 4g covers several builds. You also get a consistency ARCTIC pitches at first-time builders. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better.
Another plus: maker-rated for up to 8 years without reapplying. Worth noting: carbon microparticle formula. It makes the most sense for buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula, since it offers the cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula. It was the cheapest of the group when we checked; the MX-4 with spatula was the next step up.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Rated service life
- up to 8 years
- Compound
- Carbon microparticle
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Maker-rated for up to 8 years without reapplying
- Carbon microparticle formula
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
Also Consider2 of 5
ARCTIC MX-4 with Spatula (4g)
This is the same MX-4 formula with a spatula in the box, which helps if you prefer to spread rather than dot.
Best for
- Buyers who want authenticity code on every pack.
Skip if
- Price-first buyers should look at the MX-4, which cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
Each pack carries an authenticity code, a useful check given how often MX-4 is counterfeited. It also offers metal-free carbon microparticles. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better.
Another plus: 4g is enough for several applications. You also get this: electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless. Before buying, weigh one limit: costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing. Its price falls between the MX-4 and the MX-7, based on our last check.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Compound
- Carbon microparticle
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- In the box
- a spatula
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Carbon microparticle formula
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Includes a spatula
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
Strong Alternative3 of 5
ARCTIC MX-7 (4g)
MX-7 is Arctic's dense, high-filler paste, built to resist pump-out and drying on hot CPUs.
Best for
- Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula.
Skip if
- If budget leads, the MX-4 was cheaper at our last price check.
Why we like it
It cannot be spread by hand, so apply a dot and let the cooler's pressure do the work. You also get resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better.
Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. Another plus: electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless. On price it sat third of 5, between the cheaper MX-4 with spatula and the pricier MX-6 with cleaner, at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- Application
- Cannot be spread by hand; cooler pressure distributes it
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Dense, high-filler formula
- Resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
Worth a Look4 of 5
ARCTIC MX-6 with MX Cleaner (4g)
The 4g MX-6 comes with six MX Cleaner wipes, so the old paste comes off without a trip for isopropyl alcohol.
Best for
- Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure.
Skip if
- If budget leads, the MX-4 was cheaper at our last price check.
Why we like it
It is neither electrically conductive nor capacitive, which makes it safe for bare GPU dies. It also offers lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better.
Another plus: 4g is enough for several applications. You also get this: electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless. When we checked, only the MX-7 and cheaper picks cost less, and the MX-6 cost more.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- In the box
- six MX Cleaner wipes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Includes six MX Cleaner wipes
- Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
Premium Pick5 of 5
ARCTIC MX-6 (4g)
MX-6 is the dependable all-rounder: 4g of non-conductive paste that Arctic says beats MX-4, with a consistency suited to bare GPU dies.
Best for
- Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs.
Skip if
- If budget leads, the MX-4 was cheaper at our last price check.
Why we like it
It is the value choice for regular use. It also comes with lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU use. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better.
Worth noting: 4g is enough for several applications. It was the most expensive pick when we checked, so weigh what it adds over the MX-6 with cleaner. If tube size is your priority, the MX-4 (4g) is the stronger choice.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure
- Viscosity suited to direct-die GPU use
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
How We Chose
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

- What we compared
- We set side by side five pastes on tube size, compound, electrically non-conductive and in the box as the makers state them. Nothing was tested in-house; 2 of the 4 fields compared are stated for every pick, while compound and in the box have gaps.
- The shared baseline
- All 5, from the MX-4 to the MX-6, state tube size and electrically non-conductive and share electrically non-conductive.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The MX-7, the MX-6 with cleaner and the MX-6 give no compound; the MX-4, the MX-7 and the MX-6 give no in the box.
- Price range
- From the MX-4 to the MX-6, all sat in the under $50 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in an ARCTIC Thermal Paste
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
Electrically non-conductive
The MX-4, the MX-4 with spatula, the MX-7, the MX-6 with cleaner and the MX-6 have it.
Features beyond the spec table
The MX-7: resistance to pump-out, dry-out and bleeding. The MX-6 with cleaner: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips. The MX-6: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU use.

A tower air cooler in a case with red-lit fans Where your budget lands
Price does little to separate these 5: the MX-4 through the MX-6 all landed in the under $50 tier, which leaves features to decide it.
Match the pick to your priority
Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula: the MX-4. Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs: the MX-6.

An all-in-one liquid cooler pump block above a graphics card Buy the amount you will use
One large CPU uses about 0.2g to 0.5g. A 1g tube covers a couple of builds; 4g or more suits regular remounts or several machines.
How to Choose an ARCTIC Thermal Paste
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula | MX-4 | The cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula |
| Buyers who want authenticity code on every pack | MX-4 with spatula | An authenticity code on every pack |
| Buyers who want dense, high-filler formula | MX-7 | A dense, high-filler formula |
| Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure | MX-6 with cleaner | Lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure |
| Buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs | MX-6 | The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure |
Scroll sideways to see every column.

Key specs side by side
The MX-4, the MX-4 with spatula and the rest, as their makers list them.
| Paste | Amount | Compound | Electrically non-conductive | In the box |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX-4 | 4g | Carbon microparticle | Yes | Not listed |
| MX-4 with spatula | 4g | Carbon microparticle | Yes | a spatula |
| MX-7 | 4g | Not listed | Yes | Not listed |
| MX-6 with cleaner | 4g | Not listed | Yes | six MX Cleaner wipes |
| MX-6 | 4g | Not listed | Yes | Not listed |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes the MX-4 the Lowest Price Here?
It earns the label for the cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula. It makes sense for anyone who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula.
Do the MX-4 with spatula and the MX-6 with cleaner differ on in the box?
The MX-4 with spatula uses a spatula; the MX-6 with cleaner uses six MX Cleaner wipes. The makers of the MX-4, the MX-7 and the MX-6 don't state in the box, so 2 of 5 picks are covered here.
Beyond the specs, what sets the MX-4 and the MX-4 with spatula apart?
The MX-4: a formula ARCTIC says lasts at least eight years once applied. The MX-4 with spatula: an authenticity code on every pack. The MX-7: a dense, high-filler formula.
Should I pick the MX-4 or the MX-6?
The MX-4 suits buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the MX-4 with spatula; the MX-6 suits buyers who want lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure and can spend more than the MX-6 with cleaner costs.
What else do the MX-6 with cleaner and the MX-6 offer?
The MX-6 with cleaner: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU and console chips. The MX-6: a viscosity suited to direct-die GPU use.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the MX-4, chosen for the cheapest way into this group, below the MX-4 with spatula. Look at the MX-4 with spatula for an authenticity code on every pack, the MX-7 for a dense, high-filler formula and the MX-6 with cleaner for lower thermal resistance than ARCTIC's MX-4, by the maker's measure if those matter more to you.
MX-7 is designed not to be spread by hand; apply a dot and mount the cooler.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best Thermal Pastes for CPUs and GPUs
- Related guideThe Best CPU Air Coolers
- Related guideThe Best Air Coolers
- Lower budgetThe Best Thermal Paste Under $10
- Similar guideThe Best Thermal Paste Kits
- ExplainerPC Airflow Explained
- ExplainerHow Many Case Fans Do You Need?
- Check compatibility: processorsCPU Specs Explained: Cores, Threads, Clock Speed, Cache, and TDP
- Similar guideThe Best Noctua Thermal Paste
- Topic hubAll cpu coolers and cooling guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles