Buying Guide
The Best Portable External SSD
From the SSK 500GB to the X9 2TB: five external drives ranked on capacity and rated read speed, with who should skip each one.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated

Portable SSDs are faster and tougher than hard drives because they have no moving parts. Every pick is an SSD, ordered from the lowest listed price.
Our comparison rests on published figures for drive type, capacity (as reviewed) and max read speed; nothing here was tested in-house, and where a maker leaves out max read speed, we say so.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

Lowest Price Here
SSK Portable SSD 500GBUndercutting the GARMESE on price when we checked.
Best for: Keeping the cost under $100.
Check price for SSK Portable SSD 500GB on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Fastest Rated Read Speed
GARMESE 1TB External SSDThe fastest rated read speed here (2,000MB/s).
Best for: Buyers who put rated read speed first.
Check price for GARMESE 1TB External SSD on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
Crucial X9 1TB External SSDA USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection.
Best for: Buyers who want USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection.
Check price for Crucial X9 1TB External SSD on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
WD_Black P50 Game Drive SSD 500GBPlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility.
Best for: Buyers who want PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility.
Check price for WD_Black P50 Game Drive SSD 500GB on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Largest Capacity
Crucial X9 Portable SSD 2TBThe largest capacity here (2TB).
Best for: Buyers who put capacity first.
Check price for Crucial X9 Portable SSD 2TB on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Our Picks
Lowest Price Here1 of 5
SSK Portable SSD 500GB
SSK's 500GB SSD ships with both USB-C and USB-A cables and offers 1,050MB/s reads.
Best for
- Keeping the cost under $100.
Skip if
- Skip it if this is a deal-breaker for you: capacity of 0.5TB, behind the X9 2TB (2TB).
Why we like it
It is the cheapest SSD here. It reads at up to 1,050MB/s over a 10Gbps USB-C link, fast enough for moving large project folders. Expect about 465GB to show in Windows, which is normal for a 500GB drive.
SLC caching keeps large transfers fast, and S.M.A.R.T. and TRIM support help it last. It reads at up to 1050MB/s and writes at up to 1000MB/s over 10Gbps USB. S.M.A.R.T. health reporting and TRIM help keep write speeds consistent over time.
It matches the WD_Black P50 500GB on capacity (0.5TB). It matches the X9 2TB on rated read speed (1,050MB/s). You also get an activity LED and an SLC cache for steady transfers. It was the cheapest of the group when we checked; the GARMESE was the next step up.
Key specs
- Drive type
- SSD
- Capacity (as reviewed)
- 0.5TB
- Max read speed
- 1,050MB/s
- Connection
- USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C and USB-A cables)
- Durability claim
- Not stated
- Security
- None stated
Pros
- Both USB-C and USB-A cables
- Activity LED
- SLC cache for steady transfers
- Undercutting the GARMESE on price when we checked
Cons
- Capacity of 0.5TB, behind the X9 2TB (2TB)
The catch
The main gap: capacity of 0.5TB, behind the X9 2TB (2TB). If that matters, the X9 2TB is rated for 2TB.
Fastest Rated Read Speed2 of 5
GARMESE 1TB External SSD
GARMESE's SSD offers 2,000MB/s reads in a 33g body with a keychain hole.
Best for
- Buyers who put rated read speed first.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the SSK 500GB cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
A USB-A adapter is included. It reads at up to 2,000MB/s over USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, which is twice a standard 10Gbps drive. Full speed needs a 20Gbps port.
It uses USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 for reads up to 2000MB/s and writes up to 1800MB/s, which needs a 20Gbps port. On capacity it ties with the Crucial X9 1TB at 1TB. On rated read speed it leads this guide at 2,000MB/s, ahead of the SSK 500GB (1,050MB/s).
It also comes with 1,800MB/s rated writes. Its top speed needs a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) port; most laptops and all Macs run it at 10Gbps speeds instead. It was priced above the SSK 500GB and below the Crucial X9 1TB at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Drive type
- SSD
- Capacity (as reviewed)
- 1TB
- Max read speed
- 2,000MB/s
- Connection
- USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (USB-C, USB-A adapter)
- Durability claim
- Shock resistant
- Security
- None stated
Pros
- rated reads up to 2,000MB/s
- 33g body with a keychain hole
- 1,800MB/s rated writes
- Included USB-A adapter
Cons
- Costs more than the SSK 500GB at the time of writing
Also Consider3 of 5
Crucial X9 1TB External SSD
The Crucial X9 1TB is built around a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection.
Best for
- Buyers who want USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection.
Skip if
- Its rated read speed is not published, which rules it out if you need that number.
Why we like it
On the spec sheet, it is rated for 1TB. It matches the GARMESE on capacity (1TB). On price it sat third of 5, between the cheaper GARMESE and the pricier WD_Black P50 500GB, at the time of writing. The maker doesn't give its rated read speed; if that figure matters, the GARMESE offers 2,000MB/s.
Key specs
- Drive type
- SSD
- Capacity (as reviewed)
- 1TB
- Connection
- USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps)
- Durability claim
- Not stated
- Security
- None stated
Pros
- USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection
- Capacity of 1TB, ahead of the SSK 500GB
- SSD drive type
Cons
- No published rated read speed
- Costs more than the SSK 500GB at the time of writing
Strong Alternative4 of 5
WD_Black P50 Game Drive SSD 500GB
The WD_Black P50 500GB is built around PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility.
Best for
- Buyers who want PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility.
Skip if
- Skip it if capacity matters most to you; the X9 2TB offers 2TB.
Why we like it
On the spec sheet, it is rated for 0.5TB. It matches the SSK 500GB on capacity (0.5TB). A USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) connection is unique to it among these picks, while the X9 2TB uses a USB-C (USB 3.2) connection.
Its top speed needs a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) port; most laptops and all Macs run it at 10Gbps speeds instead. Its price falls between the Crucial X9 1TB and the X9 2TB, based on our last check. If capacity is your priority, the X9 2TB (2TB) is the stronger choice.
Key specs
- Drive type
- SSD
- Capacity (as reviewed)
- 0.5TB
- Connection
- USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps)
- Durability claim
- Not stated
- Security
- None stated
Pros
- PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility
- USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) connection, the only one here
- SSD drive type
- 0.5TB capacity
Cons
- Capacity trails the X9 2TB (2TB)
- No published rated read speed
- Costs more than the SSK 500GB at the time of writing
Largest Capacity5 of 5
Crucial X9 Portable SSD 2TB
The 2TB X9 keeps the 1,050MB/s rating and IP55 build of the 1TB model.
Best for
- Buyers who put capacity first.
Skip if
- Skip it if rated read speed matters most to you; the GARMESE offers 2,000MB/s.
Why we like it
It has room for a larger game library. It is rated IP55 for water and dust and survives drops of up to 7.5 feet, so it can travel in a camera bag. It works with consoles as well as Windows, Mac and iPad Pro.
It reads at up to 1050MB/s and carries an IP55 water and dust rating with drop resistance to 2 meters. It works with Windows, Mac, PS5 and Xbox over USB-C or USB-A. Nothing else here matches its 2TB capacity; the GARMESE comes closest at 1TB.
It matches the SSK 500GB on rated read speed (1,050MB/s). A USB-C (USB 3.2) connection is unique to it among these picks, while the WD_Black P50 500GB uses a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) connection. It was the most expensive pick when we checked, so weigh what it adds over the WD_Black P50 500GB.
Key specs
- Drive type
- SSD
- Capacity (as reviewed)
- 2TB
- Max read speed
- 1,050MB/s
- Connection
- USB-C (USB 3.2)
- Durability claim
- IP55, drops up to 7.5ft
- Security
- None stated
Pros
- IP55 rating
- Drop resistance up to 7.5ft
- 2TB for a larger game library
- Largest capacity of the picks (2TB)
Cons
- Rated read speed trails the GARMESE (2,000MB/s)
- Costs more than the SSK 500GB at the time of writing
The catch
If rated read speed is your priority, the GARMESE (2,000MB/s) is the stronger choice.
How We Chose
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

- The figures behind the order
- We compared five drives on drive type, capacity, rated read speed and connection as the makers state them. Nothing was tested in-house; 4 of the 6 fields compared are stated for every pick, while rated read speed and durability claim have gaps.
- The shared baseline
- All 5, from the SSK 500GB to the X9 2TB, state drive type, capacity and connection and share None stated security.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The Crucial X9 1TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB give no rated read speed; the SSK 500GB, the Crucial X9 1TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB give no durability claim.
- Price range
- At our last check the picks ran from the SSK 500GB ($50 to $100) to the X9 2TB ($150 to $250).
What to Look for in a Portable External SSD
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
How much capacity you need
The X9 2TB tops capacity at 2TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB sits lowest at 0.5TB. For less, the GARMESE is the runner-up at 1TB.
Rated read speed across these picks
Across these 3 picks rated read speed spans 1,050MB/s (the X9 2TB) to 2,000MB/s (the GARMESE). If rated read speed is your first filter, the GARMESE sets the ceiling at 2,000MB/s. The Crucial X9 1TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB give no rated read speed figure, so 3 of 5 picks are compared here.

A small M.2 SSD next to an external drive enclosure Features beyond the spec table
The Crucial X9 1TB: a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection. The WD_Black P50 500GB: PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility. The X9 2TB: drop resistance up to 7.5ft.
Budget
$50 to $100 buys the SSK 500GB; $150 to $250 buys the GARMESE, the Crucial X9 1TB, the WD_Black P50 500GB and the X9 2TB at our last check.

An M.2 2280 SSD held in a hand Match the pick to your priority
Keeping the cost under $100: the SSK 500GB. Buyers who put rated read speed first: the GARMESE. Buyers who put capacity first: the X9 2TB.
How to Choose a Portable External SSD
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Keeping the cost under $100 | SSK 500GB | Undercutting the GARMESE on price when we checked |
| Buyers who put rated read speed first | GARMESE | The fastest rated read speed here (2,000MB/s) |
| Buyers who want USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection | Crucial X9 1TB | A USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection |
| Buyers who want PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility | WD_Black P50 500GB | PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility |
| Buyers who put capacity first | X9 2TB | The largest capacity here (2TB) |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Key specs side by side
The X9 2TB leads on capacity at 2TB, ahead of the GARMESE at 1TB. "Not listed" marks rated read speed where the Crucial X9 1TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB leave the figure out.
| Drive | Drive type | Capacity (as reviewed) | Max read speed | Connection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSK 500GB | SSD | 0.5TB | 1,050MB/s | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C and USB-A cables) |
| GARMESE | SSD | 1TB | 2,000MB/s | USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (USB-C, USB-A adapter) |
| Crucial X9 1TB | SSD | 1TB | Not listed | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) |
| WD_Black P50 500GB | SSD | 0.5TB | Not listed | USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) |
| X9 2TB | SSD | 2TB | 1,050MB/s | USB-C (USB 3.2) |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
By price at the time of writing
At our last check the cheapest pick, the SSK 500GB, sat in the $50 to $100 tier, 2 tiers in all up to the X9 2TB at $150 to $250; Amazon prices move, so recheck before buying.
| Price tier | Drives |
|---|---|
| About $50 to $100 | SSK 500GB |
| About $150 to $250 | GARMESE, Crucial X9 1TB, WD_Black P50 500GB, X9 2TB |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the X9 2TB ahead of the GARMESE on capacity?
The X9 2TB tops capacity at 2TB; the GARMESE follows at 1TB, 100% apart. The WD_Black P50 500GB closes the ranking at 0.5TB.
Which has the fastest rated read speed: the GARMESE or the SSK 500GB?
Between the top two, it is 2,000MB/s on the GARMESE against 1,050MB/s on the SSK 500GB, a 90% difference. The Crucial X9 1TB and the WD_Black P50 500GB are left out of this ranking because their rated read speed isn't stated; 3 of 5 picks are ranked.
Is the X9 2TB worth paying more than the SSK 500GB?
On paper it adds capacity (2TB against 0.5TB). The SSK 500GB sat in the $50 to $100 tier and the X9 2TB in the $150 to $250 tier when we checked, with 3 other picks between them; pay the difference only if capacity decides your purchase.
What makes the GARMESE the Fastest Rated Read Speed?
It earns the label for the fastest rated read speed here (2,000MB/s). The SSK 500GB is next on rated read speed at 1,050MB/s, so this pick's 2,000MB/s is 90% further out. The SSK 500GB, the cheapest pick, sat in the $50 to $100 tier against $150 to $250 here, without out-ranking it on any listed spec. It suits anyone who puts rated read speed first.
Beyond the specs, what sets the SSK 500GB and the GARMESE apart?
The SSK 500GB: both USB-C and USB-A cables. The GARMESE: a 33g body with a keychain hole. The Crucial X9 1TB: a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the SSK 500GB, chosen for undercutting the GARMESE on price when we checked. Look at the GARMESE for the fastest rated read speed here (2,000MB/s), the Crucial X9 1TB for a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) connection and the WD_Black P50 500GB for PlayStation, Xbox, PC and Mac compatibility if those matter more to you.
Match the drive's USB speed to a port that supports it.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best External SSDs
- Related guideThe Best Portable SSD Drives
- Related guideThe Best External Storage for a Laptop: SSDs and Hard Drives
- Lower budgetThe Best Budget External SSDs
- Similar guideThe Best External SSD for Mac
- ExplainerPortable SSD vs external hard drive: which one for backups, games and carrying files
- ExplainerUSB speed names decoded for external SSDs: USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB4 and Thunderbolt
- Also see: ssds and storageNVMe vs SATA SSD
- Similar guideThe Best External SSD for Gaming
- Topic hubAll external storage guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles