Buying Guide
The Best Easy-to-Apply Thermal Paste
We weighed five thermal pastes on tube size and rated service life; the XTM50 has the largest tube size, and the MX-4 costs the least.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated

Some pastes are made to be forgiving: they need no spreading, flow easily or spread evenly without mess. Every pick is sold on one of those traits, ordered from the lowest price.
The order reflects amount, rated service life and compound from maker specifications; we did not test these thermal pastes ourselves, and a missing rated service life is flagged, not filled in.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

Lowest Price Here
ARCTIC MX-4 (4g)The cheapest way into this group, below the NT-H1.
Best for: Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the NT-H1.
Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
Noctua NT-H1 (3.5g)Cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed.
Best for: Buyers who want cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed.
Check price for Noctua NT-H1 (3.5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
Corsair XTM60 (3g)A low-viscosity formula for an even layer.
Best for: Buyers who want low-viscosity formula for an even layer.
Check price for Corsair XTM60 (3g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Worth a Look
Noctua NT-H2 (3.5g)A recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU.
Best for: Buyers who want recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU.
Check price for Noctua NT-H2 (3.5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Largest Tube Size
Corsair XTM50 (5g)The largest tube size here (5g).
Best for: Buyers who put tube size first.
Check price for Corsair XTM50 (5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
| Pick | Why it stands out | Best for | Check price |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | The cheapest way into this group, below the NT-H1. | Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the NT-H1. | Check price for ARCTIC MX-4 (4g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | Cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed. | Buyers who want cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed. | Check price for Noctua NT-H1 (3.5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A low-viscosity formula for an even layer. | Buyers who want low-viscosity formula for an even layer. | Check price for Corsair XTM60 (3g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU. | Buyers who want recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU. | Check price for Noctua NT-H2 (3.5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | The largest tube size here (5g). | Buyers who put tube size first. | Check price for Corsair XTM50 (5g) on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
Our Picks
Lowest Price Here1 of 5
ARCTIC MX-4 (4g)
MX-4 is the long-running default for good reason: a carbon-based, non-conductive paste that ARCTIC says lasts at least eight years once applied.
Best for
- Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the NT-H1.
Skip if
- Worth skipping when tube size of 4g, behind the XTM50 (5g) is a problem.
Why we like it
It forgives a clumsy first application, and 4g covers several builds. On tube size it sits mid-pack at 4g: the XTM50 comes in at 5g, and the XTM60 comes in at 3g. You also get a consistency ARCTIC pitches at first-time builders.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Worth noting: carbon microparticle formula. Another plus: electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless. No other pick here cost less at our last price check, and the NT-H1 was closest.
Key specs
- Amount
- 4g
- Rated service life
- up to 8 years
- Compound
- Carbon microparticle
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
Pros
- 4g is enough for several applications
- Maker-rated for up to 8 years without reapplying
- Carbon microparticle formula
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
Cons
- Tube size of 4g, behind the XTM50 (5g)
Also Consider2 of 5
Noctua NT-H1 (3.5g)
NT-H1 needs no spreading and wipes off with a dry paper towel, which makes it one of the least fussy pastes to work with.
Best for
- Buyers who want cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the MX-4 cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
Noctua rates it for up to five years on a CPU and about 15 applications on AM4 or LGA1700. It matches the NT-H2 on tube size (3.5g). It also comes with a recommended storage time of up to three years.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. Before buying, weigh one limit: costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing. Its price falls between the MX-4 and the XTM60, based on our last check.
Key specs
- Amount
- 3.5g
- Rated service life
- up to 5 years
- Applications per tube
- About 3 to 20
- Application
- No need to spread before mounting
Pros
- Maker-rated for up to 5 years without reapplying
- Cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed
- Recommended storage time of up to three years
- Tube size of 3.5g, ahead of the XTM60
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
Strong Alternative3 of 5
Corsair XTM60 (3g)
XTM60 is Corsair's low-viscosity paste with an applicator card for an even layer every time.
Best for
- Buyers who want low-viscosity formula for an even layer.
Skip if
- Skip it if tube size matters most to you; the XTM50 offers 5g.
Why we like it
Corsair pitches it at overclocking and says it resists drying and cracking over time. Its 3g tube size is the smallest in this group; the XTM50 leads at 5g. You get an an applicator card in the box here, which sets it apart from the NT-H2 and its a three cleaning wipes in the box.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. On price it sat third of 5, between the cheaper NT-H1 and the pricier NT-H2, at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Amount
- 3g
- In the box
- an applicator card
Pros
- Includes an applicator card
- Low-viscosity formula for an even layer
- Resistance to drying and cracking over time
Cons
- Tube size trails the XTM50 (5g)
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
Worth a Look4 of 5
Noctua NT-H2 (3.5g)
NT-H2 comes with three cleaning wipes and needs no spreading.
Best for
- Buyers who want recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the MX-4 cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
Noctua rates it for up to five years on the CPU, which suits builders who set it and forget it. It matches the NT-H1 on tube size (3.5g). A three cleaning wipes in the box is unique to it among these picks, while the XTM60 uses an an applicator card in the box.
It also offers a recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU and enough for around 3 to 20 applications. Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Do not pre-spread it; let the cooler's mounting pressure distribute it. Its price falls between the XTM60 and the XTM50, based on our last check.
Key specs
- Amount
- 3.5g
- In the box
- three cleaning wipes
- Application
- No need to spread before mounting
Pros
- Includes three cleaning wipes
- Recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU
- Enough for around 3 to 20 applications
- Tube size of 3.5g, ahead of the XTM60
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
The catch
Buyers who need a confirmed rated service life should compare it with the MX-4, which offers up to 8 years.
Largest Tube Size5 of 5
Corsair XTM50 (5g)
XTM50 is a zinc-oxide, non-conductive paste with a stencil and spreader in the box, which takes the guesswork out of coverage.
Best for
- Buyers who put tube size first.
Skip if
- Skip it if price comes first: the MX-4 cost less when we checked.
Why we like it
Its low viscosity fills fine surface channels, and Corsair says it contains no volatile compounds. Nothing else here matches its 5g tube size; the MX-4 comes closest at 4g. It also comes with zero volatile compounds, by the maker's claim.
Clean off old paste with isopropyl alcohol first, then apply a pea-sized dot or a thin line on the heatspreader; on large Intel chips an X or a line covers the longer die better. Only the NT-H2 came close to it on price at the time of writing; it cost the most of the 5 picks. There is no published rated service life figure, whereas the MX-4 offers up to 8 years.
Key specs
- Amount
- 5g
- Compound
- Zinc oxide
- Electrically non-conductive
- Yes
- In the box
- an application stencil and spreader
Pros
- 5g is enough for several applications
- Electrically non-conductive, so spills are harmless
- Includes an application stencil and spreader
- Low-viscosity compound that fills fine surface channels
Cons
- Costs more than the MX-4 at the time of writing
How We Chose
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

- What we compared
- We set side by side five pastes on tube size, rated service life, compound and electrically non-conductive from manufacturer specifications. Nothing was tested in-house; 1 of the 6 fields compared are stated for every pick, while rated service life and compound have gaps.
- What every pick has in common
- All 5, from the MX-4 to the XTM50, state tube size.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The XTM60, the NT-H2 and the XTM50 give no rated service life; the NT-H1, the XTM60 and the NT-H2 give no compound.
- Price range
- From the MX-4 to the XTM50, all sat in the under $50 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in an Easy-to-Apply Thermal Paste
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
Tube size
Here tube size runs from 3g on the XTM60 to 5g on the XTM50, a 67% spread. The MX-4 comes second at 4g, in the same price tier as the XTM50.
Rated service life across these picks
Across these 2 picks rated service life spans up to 5 years (the NT-H1) to up to 8 years (the MX-4). Start with the MX-4 if rated service life decides it. The XTM60, the NT-H2 and the XTM50 give no rated service life figure, so 2 of 5 picks are compared here.

An all-in-one liquid cooler pump block above a graphics card Extras that separate them
The XTM60: resistance to drying and cracking over time. The NT-H2: enough for around 3 to 20 applications. The XTM50: zero volatile compounds, by the maker's claim.
Where your budget lands
All 5 sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, from the MX-4 at the low end to the XTM50 at the top, so decide on features first.

A case with purple-lit front fans and the motherboard area behind them Start from what matters most
Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the NT-H1: the MX-4. Buyers who put tube size first: the XTM50.
How to Choose an Easy-to-Apply Thermal Paste
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Buyers who would rather put the savings elsewhere than into the NT-H1 | MX-4 | The cheapest way into this group, below the NT-H1 |
| Buyers who want cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed | NT-H1 | Cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed |
| Buyers who want low-viscosity formula for an even layer | XTM60 | A low-viscosity formula for an even layer |
| Buyers who want recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU | NT-H2 | A recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU |
| Buyers who put tube size first | XTM50 | The largest tube size here (5g) |
Scroll sideways to see every column.

Key specs side by side
The XTM50 leads on tube size at 5g, ahead of the MX-4 at 4g. "Not listed" marks rated service life where the XTM60, the NT-H2 and the XTM50 leave the figure out.
| Paste | Amount | Rated service life | Compound | Electrically non-conductive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MX-4 | 4g | up to 8 years | Carbon microparticle | Yes |
| NT-H1 | 3.5g | up to 5 years | Not listed | Not listed |
| XTM60 | 3g | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| NT-H2 | 3.5g | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| XTM50 | 5g | Not listed | Zinc oxide | Yes |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the XTM50 ahead of the MX-4 on tube size?
The XTM50 leads at 5g, with the MX-4 at 4g. The spread runs down to the XTM60 at 3g.
How does the NT-H1 compare with the MX-4 on rated service life?
Between the top two, it is up to 8 years on the MX-4 against up to 5 years on the NT-H1, a 60% difference. The XTM60, the NT-H2 and the XTM50 are left out of this ranking because their rated service life isn't stated; 2 of 5 picks are ranked.
What does the XTM50 add over the MX-4?
What it brings is tube size (5g against 4g). Both sat in the under $50 tier when we checked, so the gains in tube size cost little extra by tier.
Why is the XTM50 our Largest Tube Size pick?
It earns the label for the largest tube size here (5g). On tube size it leads the MX-4, 5g against 4g, a 25% margin. It suits anyone who puts tube size first.
Does the MX-4 have electrically non-conductive, and which others do?
The MX-4 and the XTM50 have it. The NT-H1, the XTM60 and the NT-H2 have no electrically non-conductive listed, so 2 of 5 picks are covered here.
What extras do the MX-4 and the NT-H1 include?
The MX-4: a formula ARCTIC says lasts at least eight years once applied. The NT-H1: cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed. The XTM60: a low-viscosity formula for an even layer.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the MX-4, chosen for the cheapest way into this group, below the NT-H1. Look at the NT-H1 for cleanup with a dry paper towel, no alcohol needed, the XTM60 for a low-viscosity formula for an even layer and the NT-H2 for a recommended usage time of up to five years on the CPU if those matter more to you.
Warm a thick tube in your hand for a minute; it flows more easily.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best Thermal Pastes for CPUs and GPUs
- Related guideThe Best CPU Air Coolers
- Related guideThe Best Air Coolers
- Lower budgetThe Best Thermal Paste Under $10
- Similar guideThe Best Thermal Paste Kits
- ExplainerPC Airflow Explained
- ExplainerHow Many Case Fans Do You Need?
- Check compatibility: processorsHow to Choose a CPU for Your PC
- Similar guideThe Best ARCTIC Thermal Paste
- Topic hubAll cpu coolers and cooling guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles