Buying Guide
The Best 32-Inch OLED Gaming Monitors
Five monitors ranked on refresh rate and screen size; the MPG 321URX is the cheapest route in.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated

32-inch OLEDs are mostly 4K, which suits both games and desk work. Every pick is a 32-inch OLED, ordered from the lowest price.
We ranked these monitors on refresh rate, resolution and size using manufacturer specifications; where a maker leaves out HDR, we say so rather than guess, since we have not benched them.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

Lowest Price Here
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLEDThe cheapest way into this group, below the MAG 321UP.
Best for: Keeping the cost under $1000.
Check price for MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLEDAn HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz.
Best for: Buyers who want HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz.
Check price for MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
LG UltraGear 32GX850A-BA dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz.
Best for: Buyers who want dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz.
Check price for LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Worth a Look
Samsung 32-inch Odyssey OLED G7 (G73SH) 4KA dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz.
Best for: Buyers who want dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz.
Check price for Samsung 32-inch Odyssey OLED G7 (G73SH) 4K on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Premium Pick
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLEDA 1700R curve at the highest price in the group.
Best for: Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less.
Check price for MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
| Pick | Why it stands out | Best for | Check price |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | The cheapest way into this group, below the MAG 321UP. | Keeping the cost under $1000. | Check price for MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | An HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz. | Buyers who want HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz. | Check price for MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz. | Buyers who want dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz. | Check price for LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz. | Buyers who want dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz. | Check price for Samsung 32-inch Odyssey OLED G7 (G73SH) 4K on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
![]() | A 1700R curve at the highest price in the group. | Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less. | Check price for MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab) |
Our Picks
Lowest Price Here1 of 5
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED
MSI's MPG 321URX is a 31.5-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with a built-in KVM, so one keyboard and mouse can switch between a desktop and a laptop.
Best for
- Keeping the cost under $1000.
Skip if
- Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements rules it out for your setup.
Why we like it
USB-C input rounds out the ports. It matches the MPG 321CURX on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it trails the group at 31.5 inches, while the MAG 321UP comes in at 32 inches.
Like the MAG 321UP and MPG 321CURX, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the 32GX850A uses an OLED panel. You also get HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a inputs and an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. It undercut the MAG 321UP and every other pick on price at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 31.5 inches
- Panel
- QD-OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- USB-C
- Yes
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Screen size trails the MAG 321UP (32 inches)
The catch
The trade-off is screen size; for more, the MAG 321UP comes in at 32 inches.
Also Consider2 of 5
MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED
The MSI MAG 321UP is a 32-inch QD-OLED that stops at 165Hz, which keeps its price below the 240Hz models.
Best for
- Buyers who want HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz.
Skip if
- Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements is a problem.
Why we like it
Its HDMI 2.1 port carries full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz from a console or PC. It matches the 32GX850A and the Odyssey OLED G73SH on refresh rate (165Hz). On screen size it ties with the 32GX850A, the Odyssey OLED G73SH and the MPG 321CURX at 32 inches.
You get a FreeSync Premium Pro here, which sets it apart from the MPG 321CURX and its a G-SYNC Compatible. It also offers an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. On price it sat second of 5, between the cheaper MPG 321URX and the pricier 32GX850A, at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 165Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- QD-OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- Adaptive sync
- FreeSync Premium Pro
Pros
- 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- FreeSync Premium Pro to reduce screen tearing
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the MPG 321URX at the time of writing
Strong Alternative3 of 5
LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B
LG's 32GX850A runs 4K at 165Hz or switches to 1080p at 330Hz for fast shooters.
Best for
- Buyers who want dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz.
Skip if
- Skip it if this is a deal-breaker for you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
Its glossy OLED finish looks punchy in a dim room but reflects more in a bright one. It matches the MAG 321UP and the Odyssey OLED G73SH on refresh rate (165Hz). On screen size it ties with the MAG 321UP, the Odyssey OLED G73SH and the MPG 321CURX at 32 inches.
Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. On price it sat third of 5, between the cheaper MAG 321UP and the pricier Odyssey OLED G73SH, at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 165Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Adaptive sync
- G-SYNC, FreeSync Premium Pro
Pros
- 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the MPG 321URX at the time of writing
Worth a Look4 of 5
Samsung 32-inch Odyssey OLED G7 (G73SH) 4K
The Odyssey OLED G73SH stands out for a dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz, and it adds a glossy OLED screen.
Best for
- Buyers who want dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz.
Skip if
- Look at the others if this bothers you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
It also offers a 165Hz refresh rate and offers a 32 inches screen size. It matches the MAG 321UP and the 32GX850A on refresh rate (165Hz). On screen size it ties with the MAG 321UP, the 32GX850A and the MPG 321CURX at 32 inches.
Like the 32GX850A, it has an OLED panel, while the MPG 321CURX uses a QD-OLED panel. Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. Its price falls between the 32GX850A and the MPG 321CURX, based on our last check.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 165Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
Pros
- 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Refresh rate trails the MPG 321URX (240Hz)
- Costs more than the MPG 321URX at the time of writing
The catch
If refresh rate is your priority, the MPG 321URX (240Hz) is the stronger choice.
Premium Pick5 of 5
MSI MPG 321CURX QD-OLED
The MPG 321CURX stands out for a 1700R curve, and it adds a 98W USB-C port and KVM switch.
Best for
- Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less.
Skip if
- Choose another pick if you can't accept this: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
It also offers a 240Hz refresh rate and offers a 32 inches screen size. On refresh rate it ties with the MPG 321URX at 240Hz. It matches the MAG 321UP, the 32GX850A and the Odyssey OLED G73SH on screen size (32 inches).
It shares a QD-OLED panel with the MPG 321URX and MAG 321UP; the Odyssey OLED G73SH goes with an OLED panel. It is the only pick here with a G-SYNC Compatible; the MAG 321UP has a FreeSync Premium Pro instead. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. Only the Odyssey OLED G73SH came close to it on price at the time of writing; it cost the most of the 5 picks.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- QD-OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Adaptive sync
- G-SYNC Compatible
- USB-C
- Yes
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the MPG 321URX at the time of writing
How We Chose These 32-Inch OLED Gaming Monitors
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

- How these picks were ranked
- We lined up five monitors on refresh rate, resolution, screen size and panel as the makers state them. These are research figures, not bench results: 1 of 5 picks leave out HDR.
- What every pick has in common
- All 5, from the MPG 321URX to the MPG 321CURX, state refresh rate, resolution and screen size and share 3840x2160 (4K) resolution and 0.03ms response.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The MAG 321UP gives no HDR; the MPG 321URX and the Odyssey OLED G73SH give no adaptive sync.
- Price range
- From the MPG 321URX to the MPG 321CURX, all sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in a 32-Inch OLED Gaming Monitor
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
Refresh rate across these picks
Here refresh rate runs from 165Hz on the Odyssey OLED G73SH to 240Hz on the MPG 321URX, a 45% spread. The MPG 321URX is the pick for refresh rate.
How much screen size you need
Across these 5 picks screen size spans 31.5 inches (the MPG 321URX) to 32 inches (the MAG 321UP). Start with the MAG 321UP if screen size decides it.

Two monitors showing a dark game scene side by side Extras that separate them
The 32GX850A: a glossy screen finish. The Odyssey OLED G73SH: a glossy OLED screen. The MPG 321CURX: a 98W USB-C port and KVM switch.
How much to spend
All 5 sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked, from the MPG 321URX at the low end to the MPG 321CURX at the top, so decide on features first.

A monitor on a stand in front of lit shelves Start from what matters most
Keeping the cost under $1000: the MPG 321URX. Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less: the MPG 321CURX.
How to Choose a 32-Inch OLED Gaming Monitor
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Keeping the cost under $1000 | MPG 321URX | The cheapest way into this group, below the MAG 321UP |
| Buyers who want HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz | MAG 321UP | An HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz |
| Buyers who want dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz | 32GX850A | A dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz |
| Buyers who want dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz | Odyssey OLED G73SH | A dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz |
| Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less | MPG 321CURX | A 1700R curve at the highest price in the group |
Scroll sideways to see every column.

Key specs side by side
The MPG 321URX leads on refresh rate at 240Hz, ahead of the MPG 321CURX at 240Hz.
| Monitor | Refresh rate | Resolution | Size | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPG 321URX | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 31.5 inches | QD-OLED |
| MAG 321UP | 165Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | QD-OLED |
| 32GX850A | 165Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | OLED |
| Odyssey OLED G73SH | 165Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | OLED |
| MPG 321CURX | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | QD-OLED |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the MPG 321CURX add over the MPG 321URX?
What it brings is screen size (32 inches against 31.5 inches). Both sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked, so the gains in screen size cost little extra by tier.
Why is the MPG 321URX our Lowest Price Here pick?
It carries the badge for the cheapest way into this group, below the MAG 321UP. It suits keeping the cost under $1000.
Do the MPG 321URX and the 32GX850A differ on panel?
The MPG 321URX, the MAG 321UP and the MPG 321CURX use QD-OLED; the 32GX850A and the Odyssey OLED G73SH use OLED.
What extras do the MPG 321URX and the MAG 321UP include?
The MPG 321URX: a built-in KVM with picture-in-picture. The MAG 321UP: an HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz. The 32GX850A: a dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz.
Should I pick the MPG 321URX or the MPG 321CURX?
The MPG 321URX suits keeping the cost under $1000; the MPG 321CURX suits buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the MPG 321URX costs less.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the MPG 321URX, chosen for the cheapest way into this group, below the MAG 321UP. Look at the MAG 321UP for an HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz, the 32GX850A for a dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz and the Odyssey OLED G73SH for a dual mode with 4K at 165Hz or 1080p at 330Hz if those matter more to you.
Sit about 70 to 90cm away to take in the whole screen.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best Gaming Monitors to Buy Now
- Related guideThe Best 1440p Gaming Monitors to Buy
- Related guideThe Best OLED Gaming Monitors
- Lower budgetThe Best Budget OLED Monitors
- Similar guideThe Best 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitors
- ExplainerOLED vs IPS Monitor
- ExplainerOLED Monitor Burn-In: What Warranties Cover and How to Lower the Risk
- Also see: graphics cardsHow to Choose a Graphics Card for 1440p Gaming
- Similar guideThe Best OLED Gaming Monitors Under $700
- Topic hubAll oled monitors guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles