Buying Guide

The Best 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitors

We weighed five monitors on refresh rate and screen size; the PG27AQDP has the highest refresh rate, and the MPG 271QRX costs the least.

By The PC Journal editorial team

12 min read5 products evaluated

240Hz OLED combines high refresh with near-instant response. Every pick is an OLED at 240Hz or more, ordered by refresh rate.

Rankings weigh refresh rate, resolution and size as the makers state them; we did not test these monitors ourselves, and if a maker skips adaptive sync, the guide says so.

Quick Picks

Our 5 recommendations at a glance. Tap a pick for the full verdict.

  1. Fastest Refresh

    ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP

    The highest refresh rate here (480Hz).

    Best for: Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates.

    Our take Check price for ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP (opens in a new tab)

  2. Lowest Price Here

    MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED

    A lower price than the PG27AQDP and the rest when we checked.

    Best for: Keeping the budget tight.

    Our take Check price for MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED (opens in a new tab)

  3. Also Consider

    MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED

    A built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.

    Best for: Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.

    Our take Check price for MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED (opens in a new tab)

  4. Strong Alternative

    Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G81SF 32-inch

    A Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film.

    Best for: Buyers who want Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film.

    Our take Check price for Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G81SF 32-inch (opens in a new tab)

  5. Premium Pick

    LG UltraGear 32GS95UE OLED

    A dual mode with 1080p at 480Hz at the highest price in the group.

    Best for: Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor.

    Our take Check price for LG UltraGear 32GS95UE OLED (opens in a new tab)

Our Picks

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP

Fastest Refresh1 of 5

ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

The PG27AQDP goes further to 480Hz on a WOLED panel, the fastest here, for players whose PCs can feed it.

Best for

Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates.

Skip if

Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop element rules it out for your setup.

Why we like it

Its 480Hz refresh rate is the highest here; the MPG 271QRX comes next at 360Hz. On screen size it trails the group at 26.5 inches, while the Odyssey G8 G81SF comes in at 32 inches. Like the MPG 271QRX, it has a 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution, while the Odyssey G8 G81SF uses a 3840x2160 (4K) resolution.

No other pick in this guide offers a WOLED panel; compare the Odyssey G8 G81SF, which has a QD-OLED panel. You get a G-SYNC Compatible here, which sets it apart from the 32GS95UE and its a FreeSync Premium Pro. To see 480Hz at 1440p, connect over DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1; older HDMI 2.0 ports cap the refresh rate lower.

Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. On price it sat second of 5, between the cheaper MPG 271QRX and the pricier MPG 321URX, at the time of writing.

Key dimensions & specs

  • Refresh rate: 480Hz
  • Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
  • Size: 26.5 inches
  • Panel: WOLED
  • Response: 0.03ms
  • HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
  • Color gamut: 99% DCI-P3
  • Adaptive sync: G-SYNC Compatible
  • Warranty: 3-year

Pros

  • a 480Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
  • a WOLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Screen size trails the Odyssey G8 G81SF (32 inches)
  • Costs more than the MPG 271QRX at the time of writing
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED

Lowest Price Here2 of 5

MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

The MPG 271QRX adds a KVM switch to a 360Hz QD-OLED panel with True Black 400.

Best for

Keeping the budget tight.

Skip if

Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop element is a problem.

Why we like it

Its built-in KVM switches a keyboard and mouse between two computers, and the stand adjusts for ergonomics. Its QD-OLED panel refreshes at 360Hz with a 0.03ms GtG response time. MSI rates its colour at Delta E 2 or below.

Its 360Hz refresh rate ranks second of 5 here, behind the PG27AQDP (480Hz) and ahead of the 32GS95UE (240Hz). On screen size it sits mid-pack at 27 inches: the Odyssey G8 G81SF comes in at 32 inches, and the PG27AQDP comes in at 26.5 inches. Like the PG27AQDP, it has a 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution, while the 32GS95UE uses a 3840x2160 (4K) resolution.

Like the MPG 321URX and Odyssey G8 G81SF, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the PG27AQDP uses a WOLED panel. You also get HDMI 2.1 inputs and an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. It undercut the PG27AQDP and every other pick on price at the time of writing.

Key dimensions & specs

  • Refresh rate: 360Hz
  • Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
  • Size: 27 inches
  • Panel: QD-OLED
  • Response: 0.03ms
  • HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400

Pros

  • a 360Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
  • a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Refresh rate of 360Hz, behind the PG27AQDP (480Hz)
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED

Also Consider3 of 5

MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

MSI's MPG 321URX is a 31.5-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with a built-in KVM, so one keyboard and mouse can switch between a desktop and a laptop.

Best for

Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.

Skip if

Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop element is a problem.

Why we like it

USB-C input rounds out the ports. It matches the Odyssey G8 G81SF and the 32GS95UE on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it sits mid-pack at 31.5 inches: the Odyssey G8 G81SF comes in at 32 inches, and the PG27AQDP comes in at 26.5 inches.

Like the Odyssey G8 G81SF and 32GS95UE, it has a 3840x2160 (4K) resolution, while the PG27AQDP uses a 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution. Like the MPG 271QRX and Odyssey G8 G81SF, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the PG27AQDP uses a WOLED panel. You also get HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a inputs and an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles.

Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. On price it sat third of 5, between the cheaper PG27AQDP and the pricier Odyssey G8 G81SF, at the time of writing.

Key dimensions & specs

  • Refresh rate: 240Hz
  • Resolution: 3840x2160 (4K)
  • Size: 31.5 inches
  • Panel: QD-OLED
  • Response: 0.03ms
  • HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
  • USB-C: Yes

Pros

  • a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Costs more than the MPG 271QRX at the time of writing
Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G81SF 32-inch

Strong Alternative4 of 5

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 G81SF 32-inch on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

Samsung's G81SF puts a 240Hz QD-OLED panel at 4K into a 32-inch screen.

Best for

Buyers who want Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film.

Skip if

Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop element rules it out for your setup.

Why we like it

Its Glare Free coating cuts reflections that glossy OLEDs show in bright rooms, and it detects logos and taskbars to dim them. It matches the MPG 321URX and the 32GS95UE on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it ties with the 32GS95UE at 32 inches.

Like the MPG 321URX and 32GS95UE, it has a 3840x2160 (4K) resolution, while the PG27AQDP uses a 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution. Like the MPG 271QRX and MPG 321URX, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the PG27AQDP uses a WOLED panel. You also get a Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film and logo and taskbar detection to dim static elements.

Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. On price it sat fourth of 5, between the cheaper MPG 321URX and the pricier 32GS95UE, at the time of writing.

Key dimensions & specs

  • Refresh rate: 240Hz
  • Resolution: 3840x2160 (4K)
  • Size: 32 inches
  • Panel: QD-OLED
  • Response: 0.03ms
  • HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
  • Adaptive sync: G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro

Pros

  • a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Costs more than the MPG 271QRX at the time of writing
LG UltraGear 32GS95UE OLED

Premium Pick5 of 5

LG UltraGear 32GS95UE OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

LG's 32GS95UE is a 32-inch 4K OLED at 240Hz with FreeSync Premium Pro.

Best for

Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor.

Skip if

Choose another pick if you can't accept this: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.

Why we like it

It is the most expensive 4K OLED here at the time of writing. On refresh rate it ties with the MPG 321URX and the Odyssey G8 G81SF at 240Hz. It matches the Odyssey G8 G81SF on screen size (32 inches).

It shares a 3840x2160 (4K) resolution with the MPG 321URX and Odyssey G8 G81SF; the MPG 271QRX goes with a 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution. An OLED panel is unique to it among these picks, while the MPG 271QRX uses a QD-OLED panel. No other pick in this guide offers a FreeSync Premium Pro; compare the PG27AQDP, which has a G-SYNC Compatible.

It also comes with a dual mode with 1080p at 480Hz and an HDMI 2.1 input. At our last price check it topped the group, with the Odyssey G8 G81SF the nearest cheaper option. Refresh rate is its weakest area, and the PG27AQDP covers it better at 480Hz.

Key dimensions & specs

  • Refresh rate: 240Hz
  • Resolution: 3840x2160 (4K)
  • Size: 32 inches
  • Panel: OLED
  • Response: 0.03ms
  • HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
  • Adaptive sync: FreeSync Premium Pro

Pros

  • a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Refresh rate trails the PG27AQDP (480Hz)
  • Costs more than the MPG 271QRX at the time of writing

How We Chose These 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitors

Each pick was assessed across 4 criteria weighted for real-world use.

The figures behind the order
We set side by side five monitors on refresh rate, resolution, screen size and panel, using each maker's published specs. We did not test them in-house.
What every pick has in common
All 5, from the PG27AQDP to the 32GS95UE, state refresh rate, resolution and screen size and share 0.03ms response and DisplayHDR True Black 400 HDR.
Where the specs have gaps
The MPG 271QRX and the MPG 321URX give no adaptive sync.
Price range
At our last check the picks ran from the MPG 271QRX ($500 to $1000) to the 32GS95UE ($1000 to $1500).

What to Look for in a 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitor

Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.

  1. Refresh rate across these picks

    Here refresh rate runs from 240Hz on the 32GS95UE to 480Hz on the PG27AQDP. The MPG 271QRX comes second for less money.

  2. How much screen size you need

    Here screen size runs from 26.5 inches on the PG27AQDP to 32 inches on the Odyssey G8 G81SF. The Odyssey G8 G81SF is the pick for screen size.

  3. Panel

    The PG27AQDP lists WOLED; the MPG 271QRX, the MPG 321URX and the Odyssey G8 G81SF list QD-OLED; the 32GS95UE lists OLED. Rule out the mismatches before looking at price.

  4. Extras that separate them

    The MPG 321URX: HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a inputs. The Odyssey G8 G81SF: logo and taskbar detection to dim static elements. The 32GS95UE: an HDMI 2.1 input.

  5. How much to spend

    $500 to $1000 buys the MPG 271QRX, the PG27AQDP, the MPG 321URX and the Odyssey G8 G81SF; $1000 to $1500 buys the 32GS95UE at our last check.

How to Choose a 240Hz OLED Gaming Monitor

By priority

PriorityConsiderWhy
Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame ratesPG27AQDPThe highest refresh rate here (480Hz)
Keeping the budget tightMPG 271QRXA lower price than the PG27AQDP and the rest when we checked
Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-pictureMPG 321URXA built-in KVM with picture-in-picture
Buyers who want Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection filmOdyssey G8 G81SFA Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film
Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor32GS95UEA dual mode with 1080p at 480Hz at the highest price in the group

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Key specs side by side

The PG27AQDP leads on refresh rate at 480Hz, ahead of the MPG 271QRX at 360Hz.

MonitorRefresh rateResolutionSizePanel
PG27AQDP480Hz2560x1440 (1440p)26.5 inchesWOLED
MPG 271QRX360Hz2560x1440 (1440p)27 inchesQD-OLED
MPG 321URX240Hz3840x2160 (4K)31.5 inchesQD-OLED
Odyssey G8 G81SF240Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesQD-OLED
32GS95UE240Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesOLED

Scroll sideways to see every column.

By price at the time of writing

The MPG 271QRX was the lowest-priced pick and the 32GS95UE the highest when we checked; tiers move with Amazon pricing.

Price tierMonitors
About $500 to $1000MPG 271QRX, PG27AQDP, MPG 321URX, Odyssey G8 G81SF
About $1000 to $150032GS95UE

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the MPG 271QRX compare with the PG27AQDP on refresh rate?

The PG27AQDP leads at 480Hz, with the MPG 271QRX at 360Hz. The 32GS95UE is at the other end of this group with 240Hz.

What does the 32GS95UE add over the MPG 271QRX?

On paper it adds screen size (32 inches against 27 inches). It does not win everywhere: the MPG 271QRX still leads on refresh rate (360Hz). The MPG 271QRX was the lowest-priced pick when we checked, so pay the difference only if those gains matter to you.

Why is the PG27AQDP our Fastest Refresh pick?

It earns the label for the highest refresh rate here (480Hz). It suits esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates.

Do the PG27AQDP and the MPG 321URX differ on resolution?

The PG27AQDP and the MPG 271QRX use 2560x1440 (1440p); the MPG 321URX, the Odyssey G8 G81SF and the 32GS95UE use 3840x2160 (4K).

What extras do the PG27AQDP and the MPG 271QRX include?

The PG27AQDP: a 480Hz refresh rate at 1440p. The MPG 271QRX: a built-in KVM switch. The MPG 321URX: a built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.

Bottom Line

Our first pick is the PG27AQDP. Look at the MPG 271QRX for a lower price than the PG27AQDP and the rest when we checked, the MPG 321URX for a built-in KVM with picture-in-picture and the Odyssey G8 G81SF for a Glare Free coating Samsung lists as 54% less glossy than standard anti-reflection film if those matter more to you.

Keep brightness moderate and use the monitor's pixel refresh features.