Buying Guide
The Best Gaming Monitors for RTX 5070
We weighed five monitors on refresh rate and screen size, and the 27GS93QE costs the least.
By The PC Journal editorial team
12 min read5 products evaluated
The RTX 5070 is a 1440p card, and a 165Hz or faster 1440p screen lets it show its frame rates. Every pick is a 1440p monitor at 165Hz or more that cost between $250 and $600.
Rankings weigh refresh rate, resolution and size as the makers state them; we did not test these monitors ourselves, and if a maker skips HDR, the guide says so.
Quick Picks
Our 5 recommendations at a glance. Tap a pick for the full verdict.
Premium Pick
Alienware AW2725DF
The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p.
Best for: Buyers who want a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs.
Our take Check price for Alienware AW2725DF (opens in a new tab)
Also Consider
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED
A built-in KVM switch.
Best for: Buyers who want built-in KVM switch.
Our take Check price for MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
ASUS ROG XG27AQDMG
A third-generation glossy WOLED panel.
Best for: Buyers who want third-generation glossy WOLED panel.
Our take Check price for ASUS ROG XG27AQDMG (opens in a new tab)
Worth a Look
ASUS ROG XG27AQDMGR
A glossy TrueBlack panel.
Best for: Buyers who want glossy TrueBlack panel.
Our take Check price for ASUS ROG XG27AQDMGR (opens in a new tab)
Lowest Price Here
LG UltraGear 27GS93QE OLED
The lowest price of the group at our last check.
Best for: Spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up.
Our take Check price for LG UltraGear 27GS93QE OLED (opens in a new tab)
| Pick | Why it’s here | Best for | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p. | Buyers who want a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs. | Check price for Alienware AW2725DF (opens in a new tab) |
| A built-in KVM switch. | Buyers who want built-in KVM switch. | Check price for MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED (opens in a new tab) |
| A third-generation glossy WOLED panel. | Buyers who want third-generation glossy WOLED panel. | Check price for ASUS ROG XG27AQDMG (opens in a new tab) |
| A glossy TrueBlack panel. | Buyers who want glossy TrueBlack panel. | Check price for ASUS ROG XG27AQDMGR (opens in a new tab) |
| The lowest price of the group at our last check. | Spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up. | Check price for LG UltraGear 27GS93QE OLED (opens in a new tab) |
Our Picks
Premium Pick1 of 5
Alienware AW2725DF on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
The AW2725DF pushes a QD-OLED panel to 360Hz at 1440p.
Best for
- Buyers who want a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs.
Skip if
- Skip it if this is a deal-breaker for you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
It suits competitive players with a graphics card that can hold very high frame rates. It matches the MPG 271QRX on refresh rate (360Hz). On screen size it sits mid-pack at 26.7 inches: the MPG 271QRX comes in at 27 inches, and the XG27AQDMGR comes in at 26.5 inches.
Like the MPG 271QRX, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the XG27AQDMGR uses a WOLED panel. Like the MPG 271QRX and 27GS93QE, it has a DisplayHDR True Black 400, while the XG27AQDMGR uses a DisplayHDR 400 True Black. To see 360Hz at 1440p, connect over DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1; older HDMI 2.0 ports cap the refresh rate lower.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. It was the highest-priced of the 5 picks at the time of writing, so the case for it rests on what it adds over the MPG 271QRX and the rest.
Key dimensions & specs
- Refresh rate: 360Hz
- Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
- Size: 26.7 inches
- Panel: QD-OLED
- Response: 0.03ms
- HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Color gamut: 99% DCI-P3
- Adaptive sync: FreeSync Premium Pro
- Stand: swivel and pivot
Pros
- a 360Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the 27GS93QE at the time of writing
Also Consider2 of 5
MSI MPG 271QRX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
The MPG 271QRX adds a KVM switch to a 360Hz QD-OLED panel with True Black 400.
Best for
- Buyers who want built-in KVM switch.
Skip if
- Choose another pick if you can't accept this: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
Its built-in KVM switches a keyboard and mouse between two computers, and the stand adjusts for ergonomics. Its QD-OLED panel refreshes at 360Hz with a 0.03ms GtG response time. MSI rates its colour at Delta E 2 or below.
It matches the AW2725DF on refresh rate (360Hz). On screen size it ties with the 27GS93QE at 27 inches. Like the AW2725DF, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the XG27AQDMGR uses a WOLED panel.
Like the AW2725DF and 27GS93QE, it has a DisplayHDR True Black 400, while the XG27AQDMGR uses a DisplayHDR 400 True Black. You also get HDMI 2.1 inputs and an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. To see 360Hz at 1440p, connect over DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1; older HDMI 2.0 ports cap the refresh rate lower. On price it sat fourth of 5, between the cheaper XG27AQDMG and the pricier AW2725DF, at the time of writing.
Key dimensions & specs
- Refresh rate: 360Hz
- Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
- Size: 27 inches
- Panel: QD-OLED
- Response: 0.03ms
- HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
Pros
- a 360Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the 27GS93QE at the time of writing
Strong Alternative3 of 5
ASUS ROG XG27AQDMG on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
What the XG27AQDMG brings to the table is a third-generation glossy WOLED panel, plus a custom heatsink and ROG OLED Anti-flicker technology.
Best for
- Buyers who want third-generation glossy WOLED panel.
Skip if
- Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements is a problem.
Why we like it
It also offers a 240Hz refresh rate and offers a 26.5 inches screen size. On refresh rate it ties with the XG27AQDMGR and the 27GS93QE at 240Hz. It matches the XG27AQDMGR on screen size (26.5 inches).
To see 240Hz at 1440p, connect over DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1; older HDMI 2.0 ports cap the refresh rate lower. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. It was priced above the XG27AQDMGR and below the MPG 271QRX at the time of writing.
Key dimensions & specs
- Refresh rate: 240Hz
- Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
- Size: 26.5 inches
- Panel: WOLED
- Response: 0.03ms
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
- a WOLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- Third-generation glossy WOLED panel
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the 27GS93QE at the time of writing
Worth a Look4 of 5
ASUS ROG XG27AQDMGR on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
What the XG27AQDMGR brings to the table is a glossy TrueBlack panel, plus OLED Care Pro with a proximity sensor that blanks the screen when you leave.
Best for
- Buyers who want glossy TrueBlack panel.
Skip if
- Look at the others if this bothers you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
It also offers a 240Hz refresh rate and offers a 26.5 inches screen size. On refresh rate it ties with the XG27AQDMG and the 27GS93QE at 240Hz. It matches the XG27AQDMG on screen size (26.5 inches).
It shares a WOLED panel with the XG27AQDMG; the MPG 271QRX goes with a QD-OLED panel. You get a DisplayHDR 400 True Black here, which sets it apart from the AW2725DF and its a DisplayHDR True Black 400. To see 240Hz at 1440p, connect over DisplayPort or HDMI 2.1; older HDMI 2.0 ports cap the refresh rate lower.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. It was priced above the 27GS93QE and below the XG27AQDMG at the time of writing. It gives ground on screen size, where the MPG 271QRX comes in at 27 inches.
Key dimensions & specs
- Refresh rate: 240Hz
- Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
- Size: 26.5 inches
- Panel: WOLED
- Response: 0.03ms
- HDR: DisplayHDR 400 True Black
- Color gamut: 99% DCI-P3
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
- a WOLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR 400 True Black certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Screen size trails the MPG 271QRX (27 inches)
- Costs more than the 27GS93QE at the time of writing
Lowest Price Here5 of 5
LG UltraGear 27GS93QE OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
LG's 27GS93QE is a 27-inch 1440p OLED at 240Hz with DisplayHDR True Black 400.
Best for
- Spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up.
Skip if
- Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements is a problem.
Why we like it
It is a lower-priced LG OLED with a two-year warranty. It is DisplayHDR True Black 400 certified with a 1.5 million to 1 contrast ratio, and the stand adjusts for height, tilt and pivot. Gamer, FPS and RTS modes tune the picture.
Its virtually borderless design saves space on a crowded desk. It matches the XG27AQDMG and the XG27AQDMGR on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it ties with the MPG 271QRX at 27 inches.
No other pick in this guide offers an OLED panel; compare the XG27AQDMG, which has a WOLED panel. Like the AW2725DF and MPG 271QRX, it has a DisplayHDR True Black 400, while the XG27AQDMGR uses a DisplayHDR 400 True Black. It also comes with an anti-glare low-reflection OLED coating and an HDMI 2.1 input.
It undercut the XG27AQDMGR and every other pick on price at the time of writing. The trade-off is refresh rate; for more, the AW2725DF offers 360Hz.
Key dimensions & specs
- Refresh rate: 240Hz
- Resolution: 2560x1440 (1440p)
- Size: 27 inches
- Panel: OLED
- Response: 0.03ms
- HDR: DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Adaptive sync: FreeSync Premium
- Warranty: 2-year
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 1440p resolution, sharper than 1080p at 27 inches
- a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Refresh rate trails the AW2725DF (360Hz)
How We Chose These Gaming Monitors for RTX 5070
Each pick was assessed across 4 criteria weighted for real-world use.
- What we compared
- We compared five monitors on refresh rate, resolution, screen size and panel from manufacturer specifications. Nothing was tested in-house; 5 of the 8 fields compared are stated for every pick, while HDR and color gamut have gaps.
- What every pick has in common
- All 5, from the AW2725DF to the 27GS93QE, state refresh rate, resolution and screen size and share 2560x1440 (1440p) resolution and 0.03ms response.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The XG27AQDMG gives no HDR; the MPG 271QRX, the XG27AQDMG and the 27GS93QE give no color gamut.
- Price range
- From the 27GS93QE to the AW2725DF, all sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in a Gaming Monitor for RTX 5070
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
How much refresh rate you need
Here refresh rate runs from 240Hz on the 27GS93QE to 360Hz on the AW2725DF, a 50% spread. The MPG 271QRX comes second at 360Hz, in the same price tier as the AW2725DF.
Screen size
Across these 5 picks screen size spans 26.5 inches (the XG27AQDMGR) to 27 inches (the MPG 271QRX). For less, the 27GS93QE is the runner-up at 27 inches.
Extras that separate them
The XG27AQDMG: a custom heatsink and ROG OLED Anti-flicker technology. The XG27AQDMGR: OLED Care Pro with a proximity sensor that blanks the screen when you leave. The 27GS93QE: a 2-year OLED warranty.
How much to spend
All 5 sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked, from the 27GS93QE at the low end to the AW2725DF at the top, so decide on features first.
Start from what matters most
Buyers who want a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs: the AW2725DF. Spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up: the 27GS93QE.
How to Choose a Gaming Monitor for RTX 5070
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Buyers who want a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs | AW2725DF | The highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p |
| Buyers who want built-in KVM switch | MPG 271QRX | A built-in KVM switch |
| Buyers who want third-generation glossy WOLED panel | XG27AQDMG | A third-generation glossy WOLED panel |
| Buyers who want glossy TrueBlack panel | XG27AQDMGR | A glossy TrueBlack panel |
| Spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up | 27GS93QE | The lowest price of the group at our last check |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Key specs side by side
The AW2725DF leads on refresh rate at 360Hz, ahead of the MPG 271QRX at 360Hz.
| Monitor | Refresh rate | Resolution | Size | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AW2725DF | 360Hz | 2560x1440 (1440p) | 26.7 inches | QD-OLED |
| MPG 271QRX | 360Hz | 2560x1440 (1440p) | 27 inches | QD-OLED |
| XG27AQDMG | 240Hz | 2560x1440 (1440p) | 26.5 inches | WOLED |
| XG27AQDMGR | 240Hz | 2560x1440 (1440p) | 26.5 inches | WOLED |
| 27GS93QE | 240Hz | 2560x1440 (1440p) | 27 inches | OLED |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the AW2725DF add over the 27GS93QE?
What it brings is refresh rate (360Hz against 240Hz). It does not win everywhere: the 27GS93QE still leads on screen size (27 inches). Both sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked, so the gains in refresh rate cost little extra by tier.
Why is the 27GS93QE our Lowest Price Here pick?
It carries the badge for the lowest price of the group at our last check. It suits spending as little as possible, with the XG27AQDMGR the next step up.
Do the AW2725DF and the XG27AQDMG differ on panel?
The AW2725DF and the MPG 271QRX use QD-OLED; the XG27AQDMG and the XG27AQDMGR use WOLED; the 27GS93QE uses OLED.
What extras do the AW2725DF and the MPG 271QRX include?
The AW2725DF: a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p. The MPG 271QRX: a built-in KVM switch. The XG27AQDMG: a third-generation glossy WOLED panel.
Who should choose the AW2725DF?
The AW2725DF carries our Premium Pick label for the highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p. It ranks first of 5 here and sat in the $500 to $1000 tier at our last price check; it suits anyone who wants a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p and can spend more than the MPG 271QRX costs.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the AW2725DF, chosen for the highest-priced pick here at the time of writing, with a 360Hz QD-OLED panel at 1440p. Look at the MPG 271QRX for a built-in KVM switch, the XG27AQDMG for a third-generation glossy WOLED panel and the XG27AQDMGR for a glossy TrueBlack panel if those matter more to you.
Use DisplayPort to get the full refresh rate and G-SYNC Compatible support.