Buying Guide

The Best 32-Inch Gaming Monitors to Buy

Four 32-inch 4K monitors, from a curved budget screen to two OLED models.

By , PC Hardware Editor

11 min read4 products evaluated

Desktop monitors on monitor arms above a wooden desk with keyboards and mice
Illustrative image

At 32 inches, 4K keeps text and detail sharp at a normal desk distance. These four step from a budget curved panel to a 240Hz QD-OLED.

We compared refresh rate, HDR certification and inputs from each listing.

Quick Picks

Which of the 4 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.

  1. Fastest Refresh

    ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

    The highest refresh rate here (240Hz).

    Best for: Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates.

    Check price for ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  2. Best G-SYNC Support

    LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B

    Listed G-SYNC and FreeSync Premium Pro.

    Best for: NVIDIA and AMD PCs alike.

    Check price for LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  3. Best Lower-Cost OLED

    MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED

    A 165Hz 4K QD-OLED with HDMI 2.1.

    Best for: OLED on a smaller budget.

    Check price for MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
  4. Best Budget 4K

    CRUA 32-inch 4K 160Hz Curved

    A curved 4K 160Hz panel with speakers.

    Best for: Tight budgets.

    Check price for CRUA 32-inch 4K 160Hz Curved on Amazon (opens in a new tab)

Our Picks

Fastest Refresh1 of 4

ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

ASUS's PG32UCDM is a 32-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with 99% DCI-P3 coverage.

Best for

Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates.

Skip if

Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements is a problem.
ASUS ROG Swift PG32UCDM

Why we like it

USB-C input and a three-year warranty round out a listing aimed at high-end PCs. On refresh rate it leads this guide at 240Hz, ahead of the 32GX850A (165Hz). It shares a QD-OLED panel with the MAG 321UP; the 32GX850A goes with an OLED panel.

It is the only pick here with a G-SYNC Compatible; the MAG 321UP has a FreeSync Premium Pro instead. You also get 90W USB-C power delivery. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.

Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. Only the 32GX850A came close to it on price at the time of writing; it cost the most of the 4 picks.

Key specs

Refresh rate
240Hz
Resolution
3840x2160 (4K)
Size
32 inches
Panel
QD-OLED
Response
0.03ms
HDR
DisplayHDR True Black 400
Color gamut
99% DCI-P3
Adaptive sync
G-SYNC Compatible
USB-C
Yes
Warranty
3-year

Pros

  • a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Costs more than the CRUA 32 4K at the time of writing

Best G-SYNC Support2 of 4

LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B

LG's 32GX850A is a 32-inch 4K OLED at 165Hz with listed G-SYNC and FreeSync Premium Pro support.

Best for

NVIDIA and AMD PCs alike.

Skip if

Worth skipping when oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements is a problem.
LG UltraGear 32GX850A-B

Why we like it

It suits a PC that cannot hold 240 frames per second at 4K anyway. It matches the MAG 321UP on refresh rate (165Hz). It is the only pick here with an OLED panel; the PG32UCDM has a QD-OLED panel instead.

It also comes with a dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz and a glossy screen finish. Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk.

G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. Its price falls between the MAG 321UP and the PG32UCDM, based on our last check.

Key specs

Refresh rate
165Hz
Resolution
3840x2160 (4K)
Size
32 inches
Panel
OLED
Response
0.03ms
HDR
DisplayHDR True Black 400
Adaptive sync
G-SYNC, FreeSync Premium Pro

Pros

  • 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Costs more than the CRUA 32 4K at the time of writing

Best Lower-Cost OLED3 of 4

MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED

MSI's MAG 321UP is the lower-priced route to a 32-inch 4K QD-OLED, running at 165Hz.

Best for

OLED on a smaller budget.

Skip if

Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements rules it out for your setup.
MSI MAG 321UP QD-OLED

Why we like it

The maker specifies an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. It matches the 32GX850A on refresh rate (165Hz). Like the PG32UCDM, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the 32GX850A uses an OLED panel.

A FreeSync Premium Pro is unique to it among these picks, while the CRUA 32 4K uses a FreeSync. It also comes with an HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz and a console mode. Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.

Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. Its price falls between the CRUA 32 4K and the 32GX850A, based on our last check.

Key specs

Refresh rate
165Hz
Resolution
3840x2160 (4K)
Size
32 inches
Panel
QD-OLED
Response
0.03ms
Adaptive sync
FreeSync Premium Pro

Pros

  • 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
  • FreeSync Premium Pro to reduce screen tearing

Cons

  • OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
  • Costs more than the CRUA 32 4K at the time of writing

Best Budget 4K4 of 4

CRUA 32-inch 4K 160Hz Curved

CRUA's 32-inch 4K screen curves at 1500R and runs at 160Hz with built-in speakers.

Best for

Tight budgets.

Skip if

Skip it if refresh rate matters most to you; the PG32UCDM offers 240Hz.
CRUA 32-inch 4K 160Hz Curved

Why we like it

The maker specifies an HDMI 2.1 input. On refresh rate it trails the group at 160Hz, while the PG32UCDM offers 240Hz. No other pick in this guide offers a FreeSync; compare the PG32UCDM, which has a G-SYNC Compatible.

Reaching 160Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Another plus: 160Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen. No other pick here cost less at our last price check, and the MAG 321UP was closest. Refresh rate is its weakest area, and the PG32UCDM covers it better at 240Hz.

Key specs

Refresh rate
160Hz
Resolution
3840x2160 (4K)
Size
32 inches
Color gamut
120% sRGB
Adaptive sync
FreeSync

Pros

  • 160Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
  • 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
  • 120% sRGB colour coverage
  • FreeSync to reduce screen tearing

Cons

  • Refresh rate trails the PG32UCDM (240Hz)

How We Chose These 32-Inch Gaming Monitors to Buy

Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.

A gaming monitor above a keyboard and mouse on a black desk
A gaming monitor above a keyboard and mouse on a black desk
How these picks were ranked
We compared four monitors on refresh rate, resolution, screen size and panel as the makers state them. These are research figures, not bench results: 1 of 4 picks leave out panel.
What every pick has in common
All 4, from the PG32UCDM to the CRUA 32 4K, state refresh rate, resolution and screen size and share 3840x2160 (4K) resolution.
Where the specs have gaps
The CRUA 32 4K gives no panel; the CRUA 32 4K gives no response.
Price range
At our last check the picks ran from the CRUA 32 4K ($250 to $500) to the PG32UCDM ($500 to $1000).

What to Look for in a 32-Inch Gaming Monitor to Buy

Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.

  1. Refresh rate across these picks

    Across these 4 picks refresh rate spans 160Hz (the CRUA 32 4K) to 240Hz (the PG32UCDM). The 32GX850A comes second at 165Hz, in the same price tier as the PG32UCDM.

  2. Extras that separate them

    The 32GX850A: a glossy screen finish. The MAG 321UP: a console mode. The CRUA 32 4K: built-in speakers.

    A gaming desk with a monitor, a racing-style chair and shelves of figures
    A gaming desk with a monitor, a racing-style chair and shelves of figures
  3. Where your budget lands

    $250 to $500 buys the CRUA 32 4K; $500 to $1000 buys the MAG 321UP, the 32GX850A and the PG32UCDM at our last check.

  4. Start from what matters most

    Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame rates: the PG32UCDM. NVIDIA and AMD PCs alike: the 32GX850A. OLED on a smaller budget: the MAG 321UP.

    A large monitor showing a game on a low media unit
    A large monitor showing a game on a low media unit
  5. Read HDR labels carefully

    HDR10 means the monitor accepts an HDR signal, not that it displays it well. DisplayHDR 600 or True Black 400 certifications say more about real HDR performance.

How to Choose a 32-Inch Gaming Monitor to Buy

By priority

PriorityConsiderWhy
Esports players with a GPU that can feed high frame ratesPG32UCDMThe highest refresh rate here (240Hz)
NVIDIA and AMD PCs alike32GX850AListed G-SYNC and FreeSync Premium Pro
OLED on a smaller budgetMAG 321UPA 165Hz 4K QD-OLED with HDMI 2.1
Tight budgetsCRUA 32 4KA curved 4K 160Hz panel with speakers

Scroll sideways to see every column.

A gaming monitor on a desk with purple bias lighting
A gaming monitor on a desk with purple bias lighting

Key specs side by side

The PG32UCDM leads on refresh rate at 240Hz, ahead of the 32GX850A at 165Hz. "Not listed" marks panel where the CRUA 32 4K leaves the figure out.

MonitorRefresh rateResolutionSizePanel
PG32UCDM240Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesQD-OLED
32GX850A165Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesOLED
MAG 321UP165Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesQD-OLED
CRUA 32 4K160Hz3840x2160 (4K)32 inchesNot listed

Scroll sideways to see every column.

By price at the time of writing

The CRUA 32 4K was the lowest-priced pick ($250 to $500) and the PG32UCDM the highest ($500 to $1000) when we checked; tiers move with Amazon pricing.

Price tierMonitors
About $250 to $500CRUA 32 4K
About $500 to $1000MAG 321UP, 32GX850A, PG32UCDM

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the 32GX850A compare with the PG32UCDM on refresh rate?

Between the top two, it is 240Hz on the PG32UCDM against 165Hz on the 32GX850A, a 45% difference. The spread runs down to the CRUA 32 4K at 160Hz.

What does the PG32UCDM add over the CRUA 32 4K?

On paper it adds refresh rate (240Hz against 160Hz). On our last price check the CRUA 32 4K was in the $250 to $500 tier and the PG32UCDM in the $500 to $1000 tier, with 2 other picks between them; pay the difference only if refresh rate decides your purchase.

Why is the 32GX850A our Best G-SYNC Support pick?

It earns the label for listed G-SYNC and FreeSync Premium Pro. The CRUA 32 4K, the cheapest pick, sat in the $250 to $500 tier against $500 to $1000 here, without out-ranking it on any listed spec. It suits NVIDIA and AMD PCs alike.

Do the PG32UCDM and the 32GX850A differ on panel?

The PG32UCDM and the MAG 321UP use QD-OLED; the 32GX850A uses OLED. The CRUA 32 4K has no panel listed, so 3 of 4 picks are covered here.

What extras do the PG32UCDM and the 32GX850A include?

The PG32UCDM: a 3-year warranty that lists burn-in coverage. The 32GX850A: a dual mode that switches to 1080p at 330Hz. The MAG 321UP: an HDMI 2.1 input with full 48Gbps bandwidth for 4K at 165Hz.

Bottom Line

ASUS's PG32UCDM is the complete 4K OLED package. LG's 32GX850A and MSI's MAG 321UP cost less at 165Hz, and CRUA's curved screen is the budget route.

About the author

PC Hardware Editor

Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.

Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility

View all articles