Buying Guide
The Best 32-Inch 4K Monitors
Five monitors compared, from the Odyssey Neo G7 to the XG32UCWMG, with the trade-offs of each named.
By Alex Morgan, PC Hardware Editor
12 min read5 products evaluated
At 32 inches, 4K gives a sharp picture at normal desk distance without scaling tricks. Every pick is a 31.5 to 32-inch 4K panel, ordered by refresh rate.
We sorted these picks by refresh rate, resolution and size, working from the makers' own data; if a maker skips panel, the guide says so, and no figure here comes from our own testing.
Quick Picks
Which of the 5 picks to look at first. Tap a name for the full analysis.
Also Consider
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLEDA built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.
Best for: Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.
Check price for MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Strong Alternative
MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLEDUp to 1000 nits peak brightness.
Best for: Buyers who want up to 1000 nits peak brightness.
Check price for MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
OLED Panel
LG UltraGear 32GX870A-B OLED 4KAn OLED panel.
Best for: Buyers who want an OLED panel.
Check price for LG UltraGear 32GX870A-B OLED 4K on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Premium Pick
ASUS ROG XG32UCWMGA dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz at the highest price in the group.
Best for: Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the Odyssey Neo G7 costs less.
Check price for ASUS ROG XG32UCWMG on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Lowest Price Here
Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 32-inchUndercutting the MPG 321URX on price when we checked.
Best for: Spending as little as possible, with the MPG 321URX the next step up.
Check price for Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 32-inch on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
Our Picks
Also Consider1 of 5
MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED
MSI's MPG 321URX is a 31.5-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with a built-in KVM, so one keyboard and mouse can switch between a desktop and a laptop.
Best for
- Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture.
Skip if
- Skip it if this is a deal-breaker for you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
USB-C input rounds out the ports. On refresh rate it ties with the MPG 321URXW, the LG 32GX870A and the XG32UCWMG at 240Hz. It matches the MPG 321URXW on screen size (31.5 inches).
It shares a QD-OLED panel with the MPG 321URXW; the XG32UCWMG goes with a WOLED panel. You also get HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a inputs and an HDMI 2.1 input for consoles. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. It was priced above the Odyssey Neo G7 and below the MPG 321URXW at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 31.5 inches
- Panel
- QD-OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- USB-C
- Yes
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the Odyssey Neo G7 at the time of writing
Strong Alternative2 of 5
MSI MPG 321URXW QD-OLED
MSI's MPG 321URXW is a 31.5-inch 4K QD-OLED at 240Hz with 99% DCI-P3 coverage.
Best for
- Buyers who want up to 1000 nits peak brightness.
Skip if
- Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements rules it out for your setup.
Why we like it
It is the 32-inch step up from the 272URX. It matches the MPG 321URX, the LG 32GX870A and the XG32UCWMG on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it ties with the MPG 321URX at 31.5 inches.
Like the MPG 321URX, it has a QD-OLED panel, while the LG 32GX870A uses an OLED panel. It also offers up to 1000 nits peak brightness and an HDMI 2.1 input. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk. Its price falls between the MPG 321URX and the LG 32GX870A, based on our last check.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 31.5 inches
- Panel
- QD-OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Color gamut
- 99% DCI-P3
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a QD-OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Screen size trails the LG 32GX870A (32 inches)
- Costs more than the Odyssey Neo G7 at the time of writing
The catch
If screen size is your priority, the LG 32GX870A (32 inches) is the stronger choice.
OLED Panel3 of 5
LG UltraGear 32GX870A-B OLED 4K
What the LG 32GX870A brings to the table is a dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz, plus DisplayPort 2.1 input.
Best for
- Buyers who want an OLED panel.
Skip if
- Pass on it if oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements rules it out for your setup.
Why we like it
It also offers a 240Hz refresh rate and offers a 32 inches screen size. It matches the MPG 321URX, the MPG 321URXW and the XG32UCWMG on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it ties with the XG32UCWMG and the Odyssey Neo G7 at 32 inches.
No other pick in this guide offers an OLED panel; compare the MPG 321URX, which has a QD-OLED panel. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk.
G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. On price it sat fourth of 5, between the cheaper MPG 321URXW and the pricier XG32UCWMG, at the time of writing.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- OLED
- Response
- 0.03ms
- HDR
- DisplayHDR True Black 400
- Adaptive sync
- G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro
- USB-C
- Yes
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a OLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the Odyssey Neo G7 at the time of writing
Premium Pick4 of 5
ASUS ROG XG32UCWMG
What the XG32UCWMG brings to the table is a dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz, plus a glossy TrueBlack panel with a proximity-sensor burn-in guard.
Best for
- Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the Odyssey Neo G7 costs less.
Skip if
- Look at the others if this bothers you: oLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements.
Why we like it
It also offers a 240Hz refresh rate and offers a 32 inches screen size. It matches the MPG 321URX, the MPG 321URXW and the LG 32GX870A on refresh rate (240Hz). On screen size it ties with the LG 32GX870A and the Odyssey Neo G7 at 32 inches.
No other pick in this guide offers a WOLED panel; compare the MPG 321URXW, which has a QD-OLED panel. Reaching 240Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K. Leave the maker's pixel-refresh routines enabled and hide static taskbars to limit burn-in risk.
G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. It was the highest-priced of the 5 picks at the time of writing, so the case for it rests on what it adds over the LG 32GX870A and the rest.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 240Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Panel
- WOLED
- Adaptive sync
- G-SYNC
Pros
- a 240Hz refresh rate for fast motion
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- a WOLED panel with per-pixel contrast
- G-SYNC to reduce screen tearing
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk with static desktop elements
- Costs more than the Odyssey Neo G7 at the time of writing
Lowest Price Here5 of 5
Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 32-inch
Samsung's Odyssey Neo G7 uses a Mini LED backlight behind a 32-inch 4K screen at 165Hz.
Best for
- Spending as little as possible, with the MPG 321URX the next step up.
Skip if
- Skip it if refresh rate matters most to you; the MPG 321URX offers 240Hz.
Why we like it
The 1000R curve is steep for a 16:9 monitor, and its Quantum HDR2000 label is Samsung's own rating rather than a VESA tier. It reaches 2,000 nits peak with Quantum HDR 2000, and CoreSync lighting on the back matches on-screen colours. The 1000R curve fills your view.
On refresh rate it trails the group at 165Hz, while the MPG 321URX offers 240Hz. It matches the LG 32GX870A and the XG32UCWMG on screen size (32 inches). Reaching 165Hz at 4K needs DisplayPort 1.4 with DSC or HDMI 2.1 on your graphics card, and a GPU able to render well above 100fps at 4K.
G-SYNC Compatible works on NVIDIA cards over DisplayPort, and FreeSync covers AMD cards. It cost the least of the 5 picks at the time of writing, with the MPG 321URX the next step up.
Key specs
- Refresh rate
- 165Hz
- Resolution
- 3840x2160 (4K)
- Size
- 32 inches
- Response
- 1ms
- Adaptive sync
- G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro
Pros
- 165Hz for smoother motion than a 60Hz office screen
- 4K resolution for sharp text and detail
- G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro to reduce screen tearing
- Mini LED backlight Samsung calls Quantum Matrix
Cons
- Refresh rate trails the MPG 321URX (240Hz)
The catch
It gives ground on refresh rate, where the MPG 321URX offers 240Hz.
How We Chose These 32-Inch 4K Monitors
Alex Morgan compared the manufacturer specifications, connectivity, warranty terms and compatibility of every pick. Figures come from the makers unless a third-party source is named; we did not test these products ourselves.
- How these picks were ranked
- We compared five monitors on refresh rate, resolution, screen size and panel as the makers state them. Nothing was tested in-house; 3 of the 8 fields compared are stated for every pick, while panel and response have gaps.
- The shared baseline
- All 5, from the MPG 321URX to the Odyssey Neo G7, state refresh rate, resolution and screen size and share 3840x2160 (4K) resolution.
- Where the specs have gaps
- The Odyssey Neo G7 gives no panel; the XG32UCWMG gives no response.
- Price range
- From the Odyssey Neo G7 to the XG32UCWMG, all sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked.
What to Look for in a 32-Inch 4K Monitor
Key buying criteria so you get the right fit the first time.
Refresh rate across these picks
The MPG 321URX tops refresh rate at 240Hz and the Odyssey Neo G7 sits lowest at 165Hz; 4 picks share the top figure. If refresh rate is your first filter, the MPG 321URX sets the ceiling at 240Hz.
Screen size
Across these 5 picks screen size spans 31.5 inches (the MPG 321URXW) to 32 inches (the LG 32GX870A). Start with the LG 32GX870A if screen size decides it.
A 4K monitor showing a detailed landscape wallpaper Response
The MPG 321URX, the MPG 321URXW and the LG 32GX870A list 0.03ms; the Odyssey Neo G7 lists 1ms.
Features beyond the spec table
The LG 32GX870A: DisplayPort 2.1 input. The XG32UCWMG: a glossy TrueBlack panel with a proximity-sensor burn-in guard. The Odyssey Neo G7: a 1000R curved screen.
Where your budget lands
Price does little to separate these 5: the Odyssey Neo G7 through the XG32UCWMG all landed in the $500 to $1000 tier, which leaves refresh rate to decide it.
How to Choose a 32-Inch 4K Monitor
By priority
| Priority | Consider | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture | MPG 321URX | A built-in KVM with picture-in-picture |
| Buyers who want up to 1000 nits peak brightness | MPG 321URXW | Up to 1000 nits peak brightness |
| Buyers who want an OLED panel | LG 32GX870A | An OLED panel |
| Buyers for whom price is not the deciding factor, since the Odyssey Neo G7 costs less | XG32UCWMG | A dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz at the highest price in the group |
| Spending as little as possible, with the MPG 321URX the next step up | Odyssey Neo G7 | Undercutting the MPG 321URX on price when we checked |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Key specs side by side
The MPG 321URX leads on refresh rate at 240Hz, ahead of the MPG 321URXW at 240Hz. "Not listed" marks panel where the Odyssey Neo G7 leaves the figure out.
| Monitor | Refresh rate | Resolution | Size | Panel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPG 321URX | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 31.5 inches | QD-OLED |
| MPG 321URXW | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 31.5 inches | QD-OLED |
| LG 32GX870A | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | OLED |
| XG32UCWMG | 240Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | WOLED |
| Odyssey Neo G7 | 165Hz | 3840x2160 (4K) | 32 inches | Not listed |
Scroll sideways to see every column.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the XG32UCWMG worth paying more than the Odyssey Neo G7?
On paper it adds refresh rate (240Hz against 165Hz). Both sat in the $500 to $1000 tier when we checked, so the gains in refresh rate cost little extra by tier.
What makes the LG 32GX870A the OLED Panel?
The label rests on an OLED panel. It is aimed at anyone who wants an OLED panel.
Do the MPG 321URX and the LG 32GX870A differ on panel?
The MPG 321URX and the MPG 321URXW use QD-OLED; the LG 32GX870A uses OLED; the XG32UCWMG uses WOLED. The maker of the Odyssey Neo G7 doesn't state panel, so 4 of 5 picks are covered here.
Beyond the specs, what sets the MPG 321URX and the MPG 321URXW apart?
The MPG 321URX: a built-in KVM with picture-in-picture. The MPG 321URXW: up to 1000 nits peak brightness. The LG 32GX870A: a dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz.
Should I pick the MPG 321URX or the Odyssey Neo G7?
The MPG 321URX suits buyers who want built-in KVM with picture-in-picture; the Odyssey Neo G7 suits spending as little as possible, with the MPG 321URX the next step up.
Bottom Line
Our first pick is the MPG 321URX, chosen for a built-in KVM with picture-in-picture. Look at the MPG 321URXW for up to 1000 nits peak brightness, the LG 32GX870A for an OLED panel and the XG32UCWMG for a dual mode with 4K at 240Hz or 1080p at 480Hz at the highest price in the group if those matter more to you.
4K at high refresh needs a strong GPU; upscaling helps.
Related Guides
- Related guideThe Best Gaming Monitors to Buy Now
- Related guideThe Best 1440p Gaming Monitors to Buy
- Related guideThe Best OLED Gaming Monitors
- Lower budgetThe Best Cheap 4K Monitors
- Similar guideThe Best 32-Inch OLED 4K Monitors
- ExplainerHow to Choose a 4K Monitor
- Explainer1080p vs 1440p vs 4K Monitor
- Also see: graphics cardsHow to Read Graphics Card Names: Ti, Super, XT and OC Editions
- Similar guideThe Best 32-Inch 144Hz 4K Monitors
- Topic hubAll 4k monitors guides
About the author
PC Hardware Editor
Alex covers PC hardware, monitors, components, upgrades and peripherals for The PC Journal, with a focus on helping readers understand specifications, compatibility and meaningful product trade-offs.
Covers: Monitors, Graphics cards, Processors, PC components, Peripherals, Upgrades and compatibility
View all articles